Gambling Act Review White Paper Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord Walney
Main Page: Lord Walney (Crossbench - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Walney's debates with the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
(2 years, 5 months ago)
Lords Chamber Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con)
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) 
        
    
        
    
        Submissions to our call for evidence were clear that online slots are likely to be the highest risk products, hence the work outlined in the White Paper addressing the risks of those and other products. Restrictive regulations on the number of gaming machines in a venue no longer make sense when it is possible to use a smartphone to gamble anywhere, 24/7. In fact, they can increase harm by making players reluctant to take breaks. What is important is the quality of supervision and monitoring that customers receive in land-based venues. We are maintaining and strengthening the protections for customers that are required in these venues, and we are still requiring operators to offer customers different types of gambling opportunities.
 Lord Walney (CB)
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Walney (CB) 
        
    
        
    
        I refer the House to my entries in the register of interests, including concerning analysis of the sector’s economic impact on communities across the UK. What will be the Government’s criteria for the success of the single customer view pilot, and how long does the Minister expect that analysis to run?
 Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con)
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) 
        
    
        
    
        I cannot give the noble Lord precise answers to that, but I will write to him with the details I am able to furnish at this point.