Information between 3rd March 2025 - 23rd March 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Walney voted No and against the House One of 15 Crossbench No votes vs 25 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 157 |
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Walney voted No and in line with the House One of 17 Crossbench No votes vs 15 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 229 |
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Walney voted No and in line with the House One of 6 Crossbench No votes vs 17 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 207 |
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Walney voted No and in line with the House One of 17 Crossbench No votes vs 15 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 339 |
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Walney voted No and in line with the House One of 24 Crossbench No votes vs 3 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 183 Noes - 234 |
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Walney voted No and in line with the House One of 31 Crossbench No votes vs 5 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 237 |
4 Mar 2025 - Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Walney voted No and in line with the House One of 28 Crossbench No votes vs 3 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 248 |
4 Mar 2025 - Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Walney voted No and in line with the House One of 21 Crossbench No votes vs 3 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 236 |
4 Mar 2025 - Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Walney voted No and in line with the House One of 25 Crossbench No votes vs 5 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 249 |
5 Mar 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Walney voted No and in line with the House One of 17 Crossbench No votes vs 6 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 146 Noes - 189 |
5 Mar 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Walney voted No and in line with the House One of 22 Crossbench No votes vs 2 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 207 |
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Walney voted No and in line with the House One of 19 Crossbench No votes vs 8 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 234 |
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Walney voted No and in line with the House One of 35 Crossbench No votes vs 13 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 224 Noes - 267 |
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Walney voted No and in line with the House One of 10 Crossbench No votes vs 2 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 168 |
Speeches |
---|
Lord Walney speeches from: Hong Kong Democracy Activists
Lord Walney contributed 1 speech (67 words) Thursday 6th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
Lord Walney speeches from: Iranian State Threats
Lord Walney contributed 1 speech (85 words) Thursday 6th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Integration and Community Cohesion
41 speeches (19,657 words) Thursday 13th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Lord Goodman of Wycombe (Con - Life peer) force change should face a fundraising and communication ban—as recommended by the noble Lord, Lord Walney - Link to Speech |
Parliamentary Research |
---|
Crime and Policing Bill 2024-25 - CBP-10213
Mar. 06 2025 Found: that being part of a protest could not be used as a “good reason” or “reasonable excuse” 407 Lord Walney |
Bill Documents |
---|
Mar. 06 2025
Crime and Policing Bill 2024-25 Crime and Policing Bill 2024-26 Briefing papers Found: that being part of a protest could not be used as a “good reason” or “reasonable excuse” 407 Lord Walney |