All 1 Lord Tyler contributions to the Financial Guidance and Claims Act 2018

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Mon 11th Sep 2017
Financial Guidance and Claims Bill [HL]
Lords Chamber

Committee: 3rd sitting (Hansard): House of Lords

Financial Guidance and Claims Bill [HL] Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Work and Pensions

Financial Guidance and Claims Bill [HL]

Lord Tyler Excerpts
Committee: 3rd sitting (Hansard): House of Lords
Monday 11th September 2017

(7 years, 3 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Financial Guidance and Claims Act 2018 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: HL Bill 1-IV Fourth marshalled list for Committee (PDF, 77KB) - (11 Sep 2017)
Baroness Buscombe Portrait Baroness Buscombe
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I reject what the noble Baroness says. For example, with regard to banning cold calling in pension scams we are finding it extraordinarily difficult to find a primary opportunity to introduce that legislation. Here, there is no question of hubris, recklessness or carelessness on the part of government. We are trying to enable a smoother transition if, following consultation some time in the future, it is felt necessary to have a fundamental change to the current body, for whatever reason. At the moment I cannot foresee it, but it could happen.

Lord Tyler Portrait Lord Tyler (LD)
- Hansard - -

I serve on the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee, whose report has been referred to. Is the Minister saying that the committee has this wrong? Is she saying that there is a precedent for this attempt to shortcut the normal procedure or that it would somehow or other be more convenient for the Government to ignore the precedents that have been referred to by my noble friend Lord Sharkey? I do not quite understand where the Government are on this.

Baroness Buscombe Portrait Baroness Buscombe
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Far from it; we are not ignoring Parliament—indeed, we have listened to the committee that the noble Lord sits on—but we do not always have to accept what the committee proposes. It is important that we listen, but no—we do not always have to accept what the committee proposes. We propose instead that there should be affirmative regulations, with consultation, that would allow a smooth transition if in future we found ourselves in a situation where it was decided that there should be a fundamental change to the make-up of this body. For example, Pension Wise was set up only a few years ago. However, since then it has been decided that it would be far more effective, efficient and supportive of the consumer if we were to have one single body, following considerable consultation both with the public and with stakeholders to ensure that the Government are reflecting the wish of the consumer.