Debates between Lord Trefgarne and Lord Cormack during the 2010-2015 Parliament

House of Lords (Amendment) Bill [HL]

Debate between Lord Trefgarne and Lord Cormack
Thursday 1st March 2012

(12 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Cormack Portrait Lord Cormack
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It could be a redacted version.

Lord Trefgarne Portrait Lord Trefgarne
- Hansard - -

You could scratch out the names.

House of Lords Reform Bill [HL]

Debate between Lord Trefgarne and Lord Cormack
Friday 21st October 2011

(13 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Trefgarne Portrait Lord Trefgarne
- Hansard - -

My Lords, we are anticipating that the main Bill, subject to the scrutiny by the Joint Select Committee, will somehow not succeed. I do not agree with that.

Lord Cormack Portrait Lord Cormack
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are anticipating no such thing. Some of us hope that these proposals will come to naught. Others wish them to succeed. At the moment, none of us knows. Although the noble Lord, Lord Tyler, and I take diametrically opposed views on the composition of a future House, we both recognise that there are certain urgent housekeeping duties that should be put into effect in this present House. That is all that my noble friend Lord Steel is seeking to do. To delay it until after the next general election would be an absolute nonsense. We would either then be having the first elections, or we would have nearly another four years of the imperfections which we are currently seeking to put right.

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Trefgarne Portrait Lord Trefgarne
- Hansard - -

My Lords, like my noble friend I am in some confusion and difficulty. We have nine clauses left to consider. There are a number of amendments to all those clauses. Some of them were tabled by my noble friend Lord Caithness, some by me and some by other noble Lords. Would it not be better to adjourn the Committee now and find another comparatively short occasion on which we could complete the Committee stage and thereafter proceed to Report stage in the normal manner? I am not trying to squash my noble friend’s Bill. That is not for me to do; that is for your Lordships to decide. I am asking that it be considered in a proper and orderly manner. At the moment we are not doing that. I beg to move.

Lord Cormack Portrait Lord Cormack
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, it will be considered in an orderly manner on Report and we will have the benefit of having concluded the Committee stage. That is the crucial point before the House. Then we will have proceeded in an orderly, tidy and satisfactory manner. We will have silenced no one, anticipated no one and pre-empted no one, and we will have reflected credit on the House rather than otherwise. I hope that, as his noble friend Lord Caithness has taken the line that he has over Report stage, my noble friend will feel moved to do likewise.