Information between 9th October 2025 - 28th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Trefgarne voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 194 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Trefgarne voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 120 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Trefgarne voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 169 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Trefgarne voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 189 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 153 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Trefgarne voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 106 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 133 Noes - 188 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Trefgarne voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 141 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Trefgarne voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 79 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 169 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Trefgarne voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 144 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Trefgarne voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 47 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 47 Noes - 136 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Trefgarne voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 200 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Trefgarne voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 194 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Trefgarne voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 193 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Trefgarne voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 184 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 244 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Defence
Asked by: Lord Trefgarne (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary) Monday 24th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government whether deterrence remains a core element of the United Kingdom’s defence policy. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) Deterrence remains at the core of the UK’s defence policy and influences everything we do; from capability procurement choices to operational activity. The Strategic Defence Review (2025) affirms the centrality of deterrence to Defence thinking. It underpins our focus on home defence and resilience, our move towards warfighting readiness, and our NATO First approach. |
|
Road Works
Asked by: Lord Trefgarne (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary) Thursday 27th November 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the right of authorised contractors to obstruct the highway. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) Authorised contractors, have a legal right to access the highway for essential works, which can require temporary obstruction. To minimise disruption and protect road users, they must comply with the Safety at Street Works and Road Works Code of Practice. To help tackle congestion, the Government has recently approved new lane rental schemes and continues to support their rollout by highway authorities. These schemes which apply charges for works on the busiest roads and incentivise quicker, better-planned delivery have shown success in reducing delays and improving network efficiency. This is why we are devolving powers to mayors, enabling local leaders to introduce lane rental schemes tailored to their areas Alongside this, the Department for Transport will publish an updated version of the Safety at Street Works and Road Works Code of Practice next year, bringing guidance in line with modern standards and ensuring best practice across the sector. Together, these measures aim to keep traffic moving and improve the experience for all road users. |