Energy: Green Deal Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Wednesday 26th March 2014

(10 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Verma Portrait Baroness Verma
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, more than 500,000 measures have taken place. The noble Lord, Lord O’Neill, expects a 20-year programme to produce an overnight success. This Government have decided to adopt long-term plans. Unlike the party opposite, which for 13 years refused to invest in the energy sector, this Government have a plan and have introduced the Energy Act, which has put renewables and low-carbon fuels on an equal footing alongside fossil fuels.

Lord Teverson Portrait Lord Teverson (LD)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, does my noble friend agree that energy efficiency, particularly in households, is the best and most cost-effective way forward for reducing carbon emissions and lowering energy bills in the longer term, and that it is therefore important that the Government stick with the Green Deal, make it work, learn and make it happen?

Baroness Verma Portrait Baroness Verma
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Absolutely. My noble friend is right to raise that issue. Energy efficiency measures are there to ensure that we reduce costs to the consumers. I come back to the point that this Government have taken some major steps to ensure that there is investment within the sector and in energy efficiency measures. I would like to know what the party opposite would do. Would it put back the £50 that this Government have taken off?