Live Facial Recognition: Police Guidance Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord Strasburger
Main Page: Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Strasburger's debates with the Home Office
(2 years, 7 months ago)
Lords ChamberThe noble Lord, Lord Strasburger, will now contribute remotely.
My Lords, this technology is used by the Chinese Government to micro-manage the lives of its citizens, so its use here needs strict rules and effective oversight. In the absence of legislation, the police have tried to regulate themselves by writing their own rules, but these are so vague that almost anything goes: targeting people who “may cause harm”, whatever that means. When will the Government do their job and legislate to control the risks of this technology?
My Lords, I have outlined the conditions in which it should be used. To compare its use with how China looks at its people is really taking a leap forward. As I have just pointed out, I think that its use when fair, proportionate and for a policing purpose is absolutely reasonable.