All 1 Lord Skelmersdale contributions to the Nuclear Safeguards Act 2018

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Thu 1st Mar 2018
Nuclear Safeguards Bill
Lords Chamber

Committee: 2nd sitting (Hansard): House of Lords

Nuclear Safeguards Bill

Lord Skelmersdale Excerpts
Committee: 2nd sitting (Hansard): House of Lords
Thursday 1st March 2018

(6 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Nuclear Safeguards Act 2018 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: HL Bill 81-II Second marshalled list for Committee (PDF, 77KB) - (27 Feb 2018)
Lord Teverson Portrait Lord Teverson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the Minister for his response. No doubt this debate will continue when we debate the Brexit and energy security report on the Floor of the House. I will just say—to all Ministers who are present—that the whole of history tells me that this is going to be a very difficult ask. It seems obvious, in terms of getting it right for the nation, that it ought to happen, but I suspect that it will be a lot more difficult than perhaps the Minister hopes. I will reflect on the answer and see whether there is anything more exacting we can say on Report—but at this stage I beg leave to withdraw.

Lord Skelmersdale Portrait Lord Skelmersdale (Con)
- Hansard - -

Before the noble Lord withdraws his amendment, as he said he would, I have noted that this debate has been entirely about new build, but surely one of the great problems in this area will be the experts needed for decommissioning.

Lord Teverson Portrait Lord Teverson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the noble Lord for his contribution. He is absolutely right. Experts are needed not only for decommissioning but for keeping going the existing fleet of nuclear power stations, which provide some 20% of low-carbon energy to our energy system at the moment. We also need nuclear co-operation agreements so that we have not just people but spare parts and everything else for this sector. I can see that the Minister wishes to intervene.