Supreme Court: Retirement Age Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Justice

Supreme Court: Retirement Age

Lord Pannick Excerpts
Monday 12th July 2010

(13 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Asked By
Lord Pannick Portrait Lord Pannick
- Hansard - -



To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they propose to increase the retirement age of Supreme Court judges to 75.

Lord McNally Portrait The Minister of State, Ministry of Justice (Lord McNally)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the Government are considering the issue in consultation with the judiciary and others.

Lord Pannick Portrait Lord Pannick
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to the Minister. Will he congratulate the Lord Chancellor on his 70th birthday earlier this month, and suggest to him that to require Justices of the Supreme Court to retire at that age, if they were appointed to the Bench after March 1995, is a terrible waste of judicial experience, wisdom and knowledge? It is especially unfortunate when some Supreme Court Justices are only appointed to that court in their mid to late 60s.

Lord McNally Portrait Lord McNally
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I first assure the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, that the Lord Chancellor and I share the view that reaching 70 is not the end of a contribution to public life. In fact, in this House most think that it is only beginning. The age limit of 70 was brought in by the reforms of my noble and learned friend Lord Mackay. The Lord Chancellor is examining it, and he is also consulting carefully with the judiciary.