Read Bill Ministerial Extracts
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord McNicol of West Kilbride
Main Page: Lord McNicol of West Kilbride (Labour - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord McNicol of West Kilbride's debates with the Ministry of Justice
(3 years, 2 months ago)
Lords ChamberI call the noble Baroness, Lady Meacher.
My Lords, with the leave of the Committee, I am going to make a slightly unusual request. The noble Baroness, Lady Meacher, cannot unfortunately be in her place. She was unable to be in the House at very short notice. However, the noble Baroness, Lady Armstrong of Hill Top, needs to chair a Select Committee at 3 pm, so I wonder if I could formally move Amendment 224 and then allow the noble Baroness, Lady Armstrong, to make her speech. On that basis, I beg to move Amendment 224.
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord McNicol of West Kilbride
Main Page: Lord McNicol of West Kilbride (Labour - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord McNicol of West Kilbride's debates with the Ministry of Justice
(3 years, 1 month ago)
Lords ChamberMy Lords, there being an equality of votes, in accordance with Standing Order 55, I declare the amendment disagreed to.
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord McNicol of West Kilbride
Main Page: Lord McNicol of West Kilbride (Labour - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord McNicol of West Kilbride's debates with the Home Office
(3 years ago)
Lords ChamberAmendments 95B and 95C are consequential and will therefore be taken en bloc.
Amendments 95B and 95C