Electricity and Gas (Carbon Emissions Reduction) (Amendment) Order 2010 Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Marland

Main Page: Lord Marland (Conservative - Life peer)
Wednesday 28th July 2010

(14 years, 3 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Moved By
Lord Marland Portrait Lord Marland
- Hansard - -



That the draft order laid before the House on 14 July be approved.

Relevant Document: 2nd Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments, considered in Grand Committee on 26 July.

Lord Marland Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Energy and Climate Change (Lord Marland)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I beg to move the Motion standing in my name on the Order Paper.

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath Portrait Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, before the House moves to approve the Motion, perhaps I can raise a point with the Minister. This matter was discussed very fully in Grand Committee two days ago, but I draw the attention of the House to the Merits Committee’s report on the order which drew attention to the fact that the draft statutory instrument had been laid with a detailed impact assessment running to 77 pages. The committee reported that, given the speed with which the Government wished this SI to proceed, it has not had the opportunity to make any detailed assessment of it.

I thank the Merits Committee for its work and for its report. Of course, I accept that there are circumstances in which Governments need to process statutory instruments as quickly as possible, but it is important that the Merits Committee is given sufficient time to do its job effectively. I ask the noble Lord whether he can give an assurance that in future statutory instruments laid by his department will be laid in time for the committee to have the time that it needs to report fully to the House.

Lord Marland Portrait Lord Marland
- Hansard - -

My Lords, the Merits Committee chose not to draw the instrument to the special attention of the House but, as the noble Lord said, it included an overview paragraph. This statutory instrument was laid after 30 days of public consultation and the committee complained in its report that it had not had sufficient time, but we believe that this order is fundamental to keeping the pressure up on developing a low-carbon economy, and so we took those measures.

Motion agreed.