Information between 22nd June 2025 - 20th September 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
30 Jun 2025 - UK-Mauritius Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago - View Vote Context Lord Marland voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 205 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Marland voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 164 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 150 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Marland voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 180 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 221 Noes - 196 |
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Marland voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 249 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 243 |
7 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Marland voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 168 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 206 Noes - 198 |
7 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Marland voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 175 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 274 Noes - 154 |
7 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Marland voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 174 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 209 |
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Marland voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 239 |
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Marland voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 158 |
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Marland voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 246 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 247 |
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Marland voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 158 |
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Marland voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 173 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Marland voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 158 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Marland voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 197 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 160 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Marland voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 150 |
Calendar |
---|
Tuesday 8th July 2025 2 p.m. International Agreements Committee - Oral evidence Subject: General Terms for the UK-US Economic Prosperity Deal At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Professor Kathleen Claussen, Anne Fleming - Research Professor & Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center Professor David Bailey - Professor of Business Economics at University of Birmingham Professor Emily Lydgate - Professor of Law at University of Sussex, and Co-Director at UK Trade Policy Observatory View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 22nd July 2025 4 p.m. International Agreements Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 2nd September 2025 4 p.m. International Agreements Committee - Private Meeting Subject: Review of treaty scrutiny View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 17th September 2025 11 a.m. International Agreements Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 9th September 2025 4 p.m. International Agreements Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 16th September 2025 4 p.m. International Agreements Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 14th October 2025 4 p.m. International Agreements Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 21st October 2025 4 p.m. International Agreements Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 28th October 2025 midnight International Agreements Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
1 Jul 2025
General Terms for the UK-US Economic Prosperity Deal International Agreements Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions This short inquiry seeks to explore the impact of this deal and tariff changes for industry, negotiation objectives for the deal, and the implications of this approach for UK trade policy. |
9 Sep 2025
UK-India Free Trade Agreement International Agreements Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 14 Oct 2025) Following the announcement of the UK-India Free Trade Agreement, the International Agreements Committee is opening an inquiry investigating the impacts and implications of the FTA for the UK. Our inquiry will investigate the terms of the FTA, any potential benefits and disadvantages to the UK, and examine how key provisions will work for important sectors. It will also take into account the bilateral relationship and the broader geopolitical context. |