Small Businesses: VAT Threshold Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury

Small Businesses: VAT Threshold

Lord Londesborough Excerpts
Thursday 5th March 2026

(1 day, 9 hours ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Asked by
Lord Londesborough Portrait Lord Londesborough
- Hansard - -

To ask His Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of HMRC data showing that an increasing number of small businesses in the UK are earning below the VAT tax threshold.

Lord Livermore Portrait The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Lord Livermore) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the data referred to does not show that an increasing number of small businesses in the UK are earning below the VAT threshold. It shows only the number of voluntarily VAT-registered businesses below the VAT registration threshold of £90,000 and does not include unregistered businesses. Of the 5.8 million businesses in the UK, 2.3 million are registered for VAT and 3.5 million are unregistered.

Lord Londesborough Portrait Lord Londesborough (CB)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I thank the Minister for his reply, but we have double trouble. First, an increasing number of registered small businesses are earning less than the VAT threshold of £90,000. Secondly, there has been a big drop in those earning £90,000 to £150,000—in fact, there was a decline of 26,000 businesses in the year 2025. Is that because some are deliberately suppressing their growth to avoid the additional tax and admin burden of complying with VAT, or is it because higher employment costs and taxation have choked off their incentive to grow? Either way, it is surely time to reset this threshold.

Lord Livermore Portrait Lord Livermore (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am grateful to the noble Lord for his question. It is neither of the things that he set out. As I have said, the data cited by the noble Lord relates only to VAT-registered businesses and does not include unregistered businesses, so I do not think it shows what the noble Lord claims that it shows. If a business is already registered for VAT, it has no incentive to suppress turnover to avoid VAT, because it is already charging VAT and would need to continue to do so even below the threshold. Why would they do what the noble Lord suggested? That would not make any sense. If he looks at a longer time series of this data, he will clearly see that it moves around significantly, so the conclusions he is trying to draw are very difficult to sustain.