Police: Retirement Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office

Police: Retirement

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath Excerpts
Monday 6th December 2010

(13 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Asked By
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath Portrait Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
- Hansard - -



To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the decision of a number of police forces forcibly to retire police officers who have 30 years or more service.

Baroness Neville-Jones Portrait The Minister of State, Home Office (Baroness Neville-Jones)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the Government have not made any such assessment. It is the responsibility of police authorities and chief officers to manage the resources and staff available to them to ensure effective policing for the communities in their area. They are best placed to consider operational decisions including the impact of using their powers under Regulation A19.

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath Portrait Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
- Hansard - -

My Lords, does the Minister not think it extraordinary that some of our most experienced police officers are being forced to retire while the Government are prepared to waste millions of pounds on the election of police commissioners? Can the Minister tell me how many police officer jobs will be lost in order to pay for the politicisation of our police force?

Baroness Neville-Jones Portrait Baroness Neville-Jones
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the Government do not accept the conclusion to which the noble Lord has just leapt. As things stand, the officers who are eligible for retirement, having 30 years’ service, number 3,260 out of a total force of 143,000 warranted officers. Therefore, I do not think that we should exaggerate the quantum of those involved.