Deputy Chairmen of Committees

Debate between Lord Haskel and Lord Foulkes of Cumnock

Monday 12th June 2023 Lords Chamber

[The Deputy Speaker (Lord Haskel) (Lab)]

Is it your Lordships’ pleasure that the four membership Motions be agreed?

[Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Lab Co-op)]

My Lords, I object that the four appointments should be taken together.

[The Deputy Speaker (Lord Haskel) (Lab)]

Is it your Lordships’ pleasure that the first membership Motion be agreed?

Scotland: Meeting with New First Minister

Debate between Lord Haskel and Lord Foulkes of Cumnock

Wednesday 29th March 2023 Lords Chamber

[Lord Haskel (Lab)]

Tell him!

[Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Lab Co-op)]

I will. I also send my congratulations to Humza Yousaf on taking over what I am afraid he is going to find is a poisoned chalice. When the Secretary of State meets the First Minister, will he say quite clearly to him that, if he is genuine and sincere in wanting to co-operate constructively with the UK Government, they should get round the table and find an agreed way forward on gender reform and container recycling that is applicable for the whole United Kingdom? Those are my first two priorities—instead of expensive legal action paid for by the UK taxpayer, which will benefit only the lawyers and extreme separatists.

Companies (Strategic Report) (Climate-related Financial Disclosure) Regulations 2021

Debate between Lord Haskel and Lord Foulkes of Cumnock

Monday 6th December 2021 Lords Chamber

[Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Lab Co-op)]

I object.

[The Deputy Speaker (Lord Haskel) (Lab)]

Is the noble Lord objecting to agreeing them en bloc?

[Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Lab Co-op)]

Yes.

[The Deputy Speaker (Lord Haskel) (Lab)]

My Lords, the Minister’s Motion to move these Motions en bloc has been objected to.

[Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Lab Co-op)]

My Lords, I exercised the right that all noble Lords have to object to Motions being taken en bloc, not because I object to these two particular Motions being taken en bloc but because I object to the fact that, when the Leader of the House made a business statement earlier today, no other Member of the House was able to ask questions or make any comments. Yet it was a very substantial statement, and some of us wanted to point out that we object to decisions about who should speak virtually and who should speak in the Chamber being taken by a party-political representative—the Leader of the House—rather than by the Speaker. I was not able to make that comment; others wanted to make similar comments. I would like the Deputy Speaker, and anyone else who can, to raise the matter with the Lord Speaker, and I will do so myself. Perhaps the Minister will too. The issue is why there was no opportunity to question the Leader of the House when she made that business statement.