Deregulation Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office
Tuesday 21st October 2014

(9 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Rooker Portrait Lord Rooker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord has not said he is taking it back to the Government.

Lord Hardie Portrait Lord Hardie (CB)
- Hansard - -

Can I clarify in my own mind what the argument is? As I understand the Minister, the justification for the clause is that it would meet the test of the Red Tape Challenge. However, I also understand that the burden of the power will still exist for a tribunal to make an observation in the same terms as a recommendation. I am struggling to understand how that does not impose upon the employer the same burden as exists at the moment. Perhaps the Minister could help me out.

Lord Curry of Kirkharle Portrait Lord Curry of Kirkharle
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I will correct something that the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, has just said. The Red Tape Challenge process is not influenced by two environmental health officers. There is a robust process which follows up the public consultation process which is part of the Red Tape Challenge. There is a star chamber with Ministers, independent representatives and government officials who thrash out the various comments that have come through the Red Tape Challenge process, and which have eventually arrived as part of the Bill.