Point of Order Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Defence
Monday 18th June 2012

(12 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Martin Horwood Portrait Martin Horwood (Cheltenham) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On a point of order, Mr Speaker. I simply wanted to explain that my question did not relate to whether or not the reactor cores could be adapted for use in Vanguard class successor subs; rather, the reactors announced today are indeed for use in the Vanguard class successors, and therefore could be used even if they did not carry nuclear warheads.

Lord Hammond of Runnymede Portrait The Secretary of State for Defence (Mr Philip Hammond)
- Hansard - -

Further to that point of order, Mr Speaker. Now I understand the hon. Gentleman’s point. Of course this is about a propulsion system, and the reactors are independent of what type of missiles the submarine might carry.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am sure that the House is greatly enlightened by that clarification. I would simply say to the hon. Member for Cheltenham (Martin Horwood) that if his essential complaint—that the answer did not relate to his question—were to form the basis for subsequent points of order, our proceedings would become very heavily extended indeed. We will leave it there for now.