Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.
These initiatives were driven by Lord Grocott, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.
A Bill to amend the House of Lords Act 1999 to remove the by-election system for the election of hereditary peers.
A Bill to amend the House of Lords Act 1999 so as to abolish the system of by-elections for hereditary peers
A Bill to amend the House of Lords Act 1999 so as to abolish the system of by-elections for hereditary peers
A Bill to amend the House of Lords Act 1999 so as to abolish the system of by-elections for hereditary peers.
A Bill to amend the House of Lords Act 1999 so as to abolish the system of by-elections for hereditary peers
A Bill to repeal the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011.
Lord Grocott has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting
There have been five such cases since 2010, including the motion on 29 January 2024 relating to the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill. The other four bills, along with the dates they were debated on second reading, were the Health and Social Care Bill (11-12 October 2011); the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill (3-4 June 2013); the Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill (4 November 2014); and the Illegal Migration Bill (10 May 2023).
All those on the register of hereditary peers maintained under Standing Order 9(4) who were members of the House before the passage of the House of Lords Act 1999 indicated their willingness to stand in hereditary peer by-elections, either before the first edition of the Register was issued on 13 November 2002, or subsequently. Hereditary peers who have succeeded to their titles since 1999 are required to petition the House to “direct the Clerk of the Parliaments to enter [them] on the register of hereditary peers who wish to stand in any by-election for election to Your Lordships’ House”.
Every peer on the register is contacted before each by-election to ask if they wish to be a candidate, and if a peer no longer wishes to be included on the register, they can request that their name be removed from it at any time.
The Register of Hereditary Peers (HL Paper 2) was first published on 13 November 2002, and is published at the start of each session of Parliament. The table below gives the year in which each peer was first listed in the Register as published at the start of each Session.
Title | Year of first inclusion in HL Paper 2 |
Aberdeen and Temair, M. | 2021 |
Abergavenny, M. | 2002 |
Addison, V. | 2002 |
Ailsa, M. | 2016 |
Albemarle, E. | 2010 |
Aldenham, L. | 2002 |
Aldington, L. | 2002 |
Alexander of Tunis, E. | 2002 |
Ampthill, L. | 2012 |
Annaly, L. | 2006 |
Ashbourne, L. | 2022 |
Ashburton, L. | 2021 |
Aylesford, E. | 2008 |
Baillieu, L. | 2022 |
Balfour, E. | 2004 |
Beaufort, D. | 2019 |
Bedford, D. | 2003 |
Belper, L. | 2002 |
Belhaven and Stenton, L.* | 2022 |
Bicester, L. | 2019 |
Biddulph, L. | 2002 |
Birkett, L. | 2021 |
Bolton, L. | 2007 |
Boston, L. | 2007 |
Braybrooke, L. | 2019 |
Brentford, V. | 2003 |
Bridges, L. | 2019 |
Bristol, M. | 2006 |
Bruntisfield, L. | 2008 |
Buccleuch and Queensberry, D. | 2008 |
Burnham, L. | 2005 |
Cadman, L. | 2002 |
Cairns, E. | 2002 |
Calverley, L. | 2002 |
Carew, L. | 2002 |
Carlisle, E. | 2003 |
Carnarvon, E. | 2019 |
Cawley, L. | 2002 |
Chorley, L. | 2019 |
Clanwilliam, E. (L. Clanwilliam) | 2009 |
Clydesmuir, L. | 2002 |
Cobham, V. | 2007 |
Cochrane of Cults, L. | 2019 |
Combermere, V. | 2002 |
Cranbrook, E. | 2002 |
Cromer, E. | 2002 |
Dacre, B. | 2016 |
Darcy de Knayth, L. | 2008 |
Daresbury, L. | 2002 |
Darling, L. | 2006 |
Darnley, E. (Clifton, L.) | 2019 |
Daventry, V. | 2002 |
Davies, L. | 2004 |
De Clifford, L. | 2019 |
De La Warr, E. | 2002 |
De L’Isle, V. | 2002 |
De Ramsey, L. | 2002 |
Devonport, V. | 2002 |
Dormer, L. | 2019 |
Downshire, M. (Hillsborough, E.) | 2019 |
Drogheda, E. (L. Moore) | 2002 |
Dudley, E. | 2015 |
Dudley, L. | 2003 |
Dundonald, E. | 2002 |
Durham, E. | 2008 |
Dysart, E.* | 2022 |
Eglinton and Winton, E. | 2019 |
Eldon, E. | 2019 |
Elibank, L. | 2019 |
Ellenborough, L. | 2014 |
Enniskillen, E. (L. Grinstead) | 2003 |
Erne, E. (L. Fermanagh) | 2019 |
Ferrers, E. | 2014 |
Fisher, L. | 2013 |
Fortescue, E. | 2003 |
Gage, V. (L. Gage) | 2002 |
Gainsborough, E. | 2012 |
Glenconner, L. | 2015 |
Glendyne, L. | 2008 |
Gormanston, V. (L. Gormanston) | 2002 |
Grafton, D. | 2012 |
Grantley, L. | 2002 |
Gray, L. | 2004 |
Grimston of Westbury, L. | 2016 |
Grimthorpe, L. | 2004 |
Haddington, E. | 2019 |
Halifax, E. | 2002 |
Hamilton and Brandon, D. | 2012 |
Hamilton of Dalzell, L. | 2008 |
Hankey, L. | 2017 |
Harrowby, E. | 2008 |
Hayter, L. | 2014 |
Hazlerigg, L.* | 2022 |
Hemphill, L. | 2013 |
Herbert, L. | 2002 |
Hereford, V. | 2006 |
Hill, V. | 2004 |
Hindlip, L. | 2002 |
Hives, L. | 2019 |
HolmPatrick, L. | 2002 |
Hood, V. | 2003 |
Iddesleigh, E. | 2005 |
Ironside, L. | 2022 |
Iveagh, E. | 2002 |
Kenilworth, L. | 2002 |
Kennet, L. | 2012 |
Kilbracken, L. | 2009 |
Kilmarnock, L. | 2015 |
Kimberley, E. | 2003 |
Latymer, L. | 2004 |
Lauderdale, E. | 2009 |
Lawrence, L. | 2002 |
Leathers, V. | 2002 |
Leven and Melville, E. | 2017 |
Lichfield, E. | 2007 |
Limerick, E. (L. Foxford) | 2003 |
Lloyd George of Dwyfor, E. | 2012 |
Lucan, E. (L. Bingham) | 2017 |
Mackintosh of Halifax, V. | 2002 |
McNair, L. | 2005 |
Margadale, L. | 2003 |
Margesson, V. | 2016 |
Marlborough, D. | 2015 |
Massereene and Ferrard, V. (L. Oriel) | 2002 |
Melville, V. | 2012 |
Merthyr, L. | 2017 |
Meston, L. | 2002 |
Middleton, L. | 2015 |
Milford, L. | 2002 |
Milner of Leeds, L. | 2004 |
Milverton, L. | 2002 |
Monckton of Brenchley, V. | 2007 |
Monk Bretton, L. | 2022 |
Monson, L. | 2012 |
Moran, L. | 2015 |
Morris, L. | 2014 |
Morris of Kenwood, L. | 2006 |
Morton, E. | 2017 |
Mostyn, L. | 2015 |
Mountgarret, V. (L. Mountgarret) | 2006 |
Mowbray, Segrave and Stourton, L. | 2022 |
Napier and Ettrick, L. | 2013 |
Nathan, L. | 2009 |
Nelson of Stafford, L. | 2007 |
Newall, L. | 2002 |
Noel-Buxton, L. | 2015 |
Normanton, E. (Somerton, L.) | 2019 |
Norrie, L. | 2002 |
Norwich, V.* | 2022 |
Nunburnholme, L. | 2007 |
Onslow, E. | 2012 |
Oranmore and Browne, L. (L. Mereworth) | 2003 |
Oxfuird, V. | 2005 |
Penrhyn, L. | 2004 |
Polwarth, L. | 2006 |
Poole, L. | 2002 |
Powerscourt, V. (L. Powerscourt) | 2016 |
Rathcavan, L. | 2002 |
Renwick, L. | 2021 |
Richmond, Lennox and Gordon, D. | 2019 |
Robertson of Oakridge, L. | 2009 |
Rochdale, V.* | 2022 |
Rossmore, L. | 2022 |
Rowallan, L. | 2002 |
Roxburghe, D. | 2021 |
Russell, E. | 2016 |
Rutland, D. | 2002 |
St Davids, V. | 2009 |
St Levan, L. | 2014 |
Savile, L. | 2009 |
Scarbrough, E. | 2004 |
Seaford, L. | 2002 |
Selborne, E. | 2022 |
Sempill, L. | 2002 |
Shaftesbury, E. | 2007 |
Simon of Wythenshawe, L.* | 2022 |
Snowdon, E. | 2019 |
Somerleyton, L. | 2013 |
Southampton, L. | 2016 |
Spens, L. | 2007 |
Stockton, E. | 2003 |
Strange, L. | 2006 |
Sutherland, D. | 2002 |
Swansea, L. | 2006 |
Swinfen, L.* | 2022 |
Temple of Stowe, E. | 2014 |
Terrington, L. | 2002 |
Teviot, L. | 2002 |
Tollemache, L. | 2002 |
Torrington, V. | 2002 |
Vernon, L. | 2002 |
Vivian, L. | 2005 |
Walpole, L. | 2022 |
Weir, V. | 2002 |
Wemyss and March, E. | 2009 |
Wharton, L. | 2003 |
Wigram, L. | 2019 |
Wilton, E. (Ebury, L.) | 2002 |
Windlesham, L. | 2012 |
Wise, L. | 2014 |
Woolton, E. | 2002 |
Wrenbury, L. | 2014 |
Wynford, L. | 2012 |
Yarborough, E. | 2002 |
*Peers who have been added to the register since the most recent edition of HL Paper 2 was published on 10 May 2022.
The information is given in the attached table. Hereditary peers who have been successful candidates in by-elections, and who are therefore no longer included in the Register, are not listed. The ‘by-election name’ in each case is the title of the former member whose death or resignation from the House precipitated the by-election.
The costs incurred in conducting the five most recent hereditary peer by-elections are set out in the table below. Three of these ballots were for two vacancies.
| Date | Cost (inclusive of VAT) |
Rotherwick, L. – Conservative | March 2022 | £420 |
Brabazon of Tara, L., Swinfen, L. (combined) – Conservative | July 2022 | £600 |
Ullswater, V., Colwyn, L. (combined) – Whole House | October 2022 | £900 |
Listowel, E. – Crossbench | October 2022 | £390 |
Astor of Hever, L., Home, E. (combined) – Conservative | October 2022 | £600 |
TOTAL |
| £2,910 |
These costs represent the fees to be paid to Civica, the contractor that supports the Administration in conducting by-elections. They exclude the cost of time spent by House of Lords staff, for whom such work forms part of their normal duties, which cannot therefore be costed separately.
There have been five hereditary peer by-elections this year, with three Conservative vacancies filled by means of a single by-election. The cost in respect of outside contractors was as follows:
| Date | Civica invoice (inclusive of VAT) |
Mar, C. – Whole House | June 2021 | £1,440 |
Selborne, E., Denham, L., Selsdon, L. (combined) – Conservative | June 2021 | £600 |
Elton, L. — Whole House | July 2021 | £1,440 |
Rea, L. – Labour | July 2021 | £0 (no ballot) |
Simon, V. – Whole House | November 2021 | £1,440 |
TOTAL |
| £4,920 |
These costs were in addition to the cost of House of Lords staff time spent organising the by-elections. Such time forms part of their normal duties and therefore cannot be costed separately.
The figures for private members’ bills that started in the House of Lords are set out below. Figures are provided from the 2014–15 session, as the 2019 session lasted less than a month, up to and including the present session to date.
Session | 2014–15 | 2015–16 | 2016–17 | 2017–19 | 2019 | 2019–21 | 2021–22 to date |
PMBs introduced in the House of Lords | 34 | 48 | 51 | 74 | 40 | 86 | 30 |
Lords-starting PMBs receiving Royal Assent | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The details of the by-election to replace Lord Elton are as follows:
Vacancy Created By: | Number of Members eligible to vote: | Number of Members who voted: | Number of spoiled ballot papers: | Percentage turnout: |
Lord Elton | 785 | 237 | 0 | 30% |
The details of the by-election to replace the Countess of Mar are as follows:
Vacancy Created By: | Number of Members eligible to vote: | Number of Members who voted: | Number of spoiled ballot papers: | Percentage turnout: |
The Countess of Mar | 783 | 317 | 0 | 40% |
The Procedure and Privileges Committee agreed on 2 March that the forthcoming hereditary peer by-elections to replace the Earl of Selborne, Lord Denham, Lord Selsdon, the Countess of Mar, Lord Rea and Lord Elton should be carried out using electronic means. Electors will vote using a secure on-line portal. The count will be an electronic process with the manual addition of a small number of postal ballots. There are no plans to allow media access to the count as it is an electronic process. Full details of the results will be available to the media and other interested parties on-line after the result has been announced in the Chamber.
The full list of ministers can be found on gov.uk at the following link: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ministerial-appointments-november-2023
The ministers currently appointed who are not in receipt of a ministerial salary are: Richard Holden MP, Rt Hon John Glen MP, Baroness Nevile-Rolfe DBE CMG, Lord Ahmad, Rt Hon Lord Benyon, the Earl of Minto, Lord Bellamy KC, Rt Hon Sir John Whittingdale OBE MP, Andrew Griffith MP, Viscount Camrose, Lord Markham CBE, Rt Hon Earl Howe CBE, Lord Johnson CBE, Lord Offord of Garvel, Baroness Barran MBE, and Baroness Swinburne.
The Cabinet Office does not collate this data centrally. Notwithstanding, to assist the noble Lord’s scrutiny, a list has been compiled from public information. The 10 year period used is 4 October 2013 - 4 October 2023.
Where Ministers were in post on 4 October 2013, our calculations have used the start of their tenure, which may precede that date.
Minister | Average Tenure from 4/10/2013-4/10/2023 (Rounded to the nearest day) |
Prime Minister | 979 |
Chancellor of the Exchequer | 699 |
Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs | 699 |
Secretary of State for Home Affairs | 699 |
Secretary of State for Education | 489 |
Secretary of State for Health | 674 |
Secretary of State for Defence | 729 |
Secretary of State for Transport | 809 |
Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport | 368 |
Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs | 506 |
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions | 543 |
Secretary of State for Northern Ireland | 578 |
Secretary of State for Scotland | 1219 |
Secretary of State for Wales | 674 |
The Cabinet Office does not calculate the average tenure of ministerial office. However, details of ministerial office-holders are on gov.uk at https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers. Details of the previous holders of each ministerial post dating back to 2010 are also available by selecting each ministerial role on this webpage, then 'previous holders’.
Details on how many private members' bills starting in both the House of Commons and House of Lords from the 2019 General Election to the 2021-22 session are available on the Parliament website at: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn04568/. In the current parliamentary session the following private members' bills have reached Royal Assent:
Bill title | House of introduction |
Ballot Secrecy Bill | Lords |
Carer’s Leave Bill | Commons |
Child Support Collection (Domestic Abuse) Bill | Commons |
Co-operatives, Mutuals and Friendly Societies Bill | Commons |
Electricity Transmission (Compensation) Bill (formerly Electricity and Gas Transmission (Compensation) Bill) | Commons |
Employment (Allocation of Tips) Bill | Commons |
Mobile Homes (Pitch Fees) Bill | Commons |
Neonatal Care (Leave and Pay) Bill | Commons |
Offenders (Day of Release from Detention) Bill | Commons |
Pensions Dashboards (Prohibition of Indemnification) Bill | Commons |
Protection from Redundancy (Pregnancy and Family Leave) Bill | Commons |
Shark Fins Bill | Commons |
Supported Housing (Regulatory Oversight) Bill | Commons |
In addition, the following private members' bills are awaiting Royal Assent. These bills originated in the House of Commons:
Child Support (Enforcement) Bill
Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Bill
Equipment Theft (Prevention) Bill
Publicly available information shows that 87 peerages have been created on the advice of Rt Hon Boris Johnson. 44 of these were Conservative, 13 were Labour and 19 were Crossbench. Ultimately it is for the Prime Minister to recommend to the Sovereign which individuals ought to be appointed to the House of Lords.
Appointments to the House of Lords are a matter for the Prime Minister to advise the Sovereign. There is a longstanding convention that the Leader of the Opposition may nominate political peers from, or representing, their own political party. Recent nomination lists include both government and opposition peers as well as cross bench and non-affiliated peers.
Appointments to the House of Lords are a matter for the Prime Minister to advise the Sovereign. There is a longstanding convention that the Leader of the Opposition may nominate political peers from, or representing, their own political party. Recent nomination lists include both government and opposition peers as well as cross bench and non-affiliated peers.
Life peers are appointed by Her Majesty the Queen to serve in the House of Lords for life, or until they retire from the House. Such peers may continue to provide public service long after they have ceased to be a Minister of the Crown – as the Noble Lord will, I am sure, attest himself.
The Government does not hold this information centrally.
Notwithstanding, to assist the Noble Lord’s scrutiny, the attached list of ministers who were appointed to the House of Lords within a month of appointment to Government has been compiled from information in the public domain. For completeness, we have provided information from 1997 to now.
There are no plans for candidates who stand for election to hereditary seats in the House of Lords to be subject to vetting by the House of Lords Appointments Commission.
Reflecting the method in my previous answers, the Liberal Democrat party is over-represented; the Conservative Party is significantly under-represented; the Labour Party has a proportion of seats in this House that is less than its seat share in the Commons, but not by a significant amount.
Notwithstanding that, there are different ways of assessing the issue. For example, one may wish to consider the share of this House excluding cross-benchers and bishops, or look at composition of peers taking a political whip. Under both measures, Liberal Democrats are significantly over-represented.
The noble Lord will be able to make his own further calculations from public domain information, if he wishes.
Based on that methodology, my assessment is that the Liberal Democrat Party, in particular, is significantly over-represented in the House of Lords.
The Conservative voice is under-represented in the Lords and has been for some time. The Conservative Party has been the largest party in the 2010, 2015, 2017 and 2019 general elections. In the 2019 general election, Conservatives won 56 per cent of the seats. Yet the Conservative Party still only has 33 per cent of the seats in the Lords, a figure which has remained substantively unchanged despite that repeated pattern of strong electoral support.
Members of the House of Lords are appointed from a wide range of backgrounds to ensure the House is able to carry out its scrutiny work effectively. In line with established convention, the number of nominations to be offered to individual political parties is a matter for the Prime Minister.
The total expenditure of the Boundary Commissions for England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland in the period 2010/11 to 2017/18, and up to September 2018 in 2018/19, was £15.6m. This includes the cost of the 2018 Boundary Review which was approximately £7.1m.
Figures for expenditure over each financial year are published by the Boundary Commissions for England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland as part of their annual reports. These are available online.
There are currently 36 Prime Minister’s Trade Envoys and information as below.
Country | Trade Envoy | Date of PM Appointment | ||
LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN | ||||
Colombia, Chile, Peru, Argentina | Mark Menzies MP (Con) | September 2016 & September 2017 for Argentina | ||
Panama, Dominican Republic, Costa Rica | Baroness Hooper of Liverpool (Con) | October 2020 | ||
Brazil | Marco Longhi MP (Con) | August 2021 | ||
AFRICA | ||||
Algeria | Lord Risby of Haverhill (Con) | November 2012 | ||
Uganda & Rwanda (watching brief for DRC) | Lord Popat (Con) | January 2016 | ||
Egypt and Cameroon | Sir Jeffrey Donaldson MP (DUP) | January 2016 & August 2021 for Cameroon | ||
Nigeria | Helen Grant MP (Con) | October 2020 | ||
Kenya | Theo Clarke MP (Con) | Reappointed May 2023 | ||
South Africa & Mauritius | Andrew Selous MP(Con) | September 2017 & January 2023 for Mauritius | ||
Tanzania | Lord Walney (Non-Affiliated) | August 2021 | ||
Ghana | Baroness Hoey (Non-Affiliated) | August 2021 | ||
Tunisia & Libya | Yvonne Fovargue MP (Lab) | March 2022 | ||
Angola, Zambia & Ethiopia | Laurence Robertson MP (Con) | Reappointed March 2023 | ||
MIDDLE EAST | ||||
Israel | Lord Austin of Dudley (Non-affiliated) | October 2020 | ||
Iran | Lord Lamont of Lerwick (Con) | January 2016 | ||
Lebanon | Lord Risby of Haverhill (Con) | August 2019 | ||
Iraq | Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne (Con) | January 2014 | ||
Jordan, Kuwait & Palestine Territories | Baroness Morris of Bolton (Con) | November 2012 | ||
UAE | Gareth Thompson MP (Con) | March 2023 | ||
| ||||
Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan | Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne (Con) | April 2016 & Kazakhstan July 2017 | ||
Mongolia | Daniel Kawczynski MP (Con) | October 2020 | ||
Ukraine | Baroness Meyer (Con) | October 2020 | ||
Turkey | Lord Hutton (Lab) | May 2022 | ||
EUROPE | ||||
Switzerland & Liechtenstein | Sir Stephen Timms MP (Lab) | August 2021 | ||
Western Balkans (Albania, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Kosovo, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia) | Martin Vickers MP (Con) | October 2020 | ||
APAC | ||||
Australia | Lord Botham (Crossbench) | August 2021 | ||
Taiwan | Lord Faulkner (Lab) | January 2016 | ||
Japan | Greg Clark MP (Con) | May 2022 | ||
Thailand, Myanmar, Brunei & Vietnam | Mark Garnier MP (Con) | October 2020 & for Vietnam January 2023 | ||
Singapore | Lord Sarfraz (Con) | January 2022 | ||
Republic of Korea | Sir John Whittingdale (Con) | May 2022 | ||
Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines & ASEAN | Richard Graham MP (Con) | Reappointed March 2023 | ||
Cambodia & Laos | Heather Wheeler MP (Con) | Reappointed March 2023 | ||
New Zealand | David Mundell MP (Con) | Reappointed March 2023 | ||
SOUTH ASIA | ||||
Bangladesh | Rushanara Ali MP (Lab) | March 2016 | ||
Sri Lanka | Lord Mervyn Davies of Abersoch (Crossbench) | October 2020 | ||
North America | ||||
Canada | Dame Maria Miller MP (Con) | May 2022 | ||
USA (specific focus on driving trade promotion with existing MOU states) | Sir Conor Burns MP (Con) | May 2023 |
As set out in the Written Ministerial Statement I made on 2nd November 2021, the Government remains committed to establishing a new beneficial ownership register of overseas entities that own UK property. This register will help combat money laundering and achieve greater transparency in the UK property market. We will legislate when parliamentary time allows.
Public appointments made by my right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Education are published on the Public Appointment Order in Council; please see the attached document. The appointments are publicly announced on GOV.UK and can be viewed here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/department-for-education-non-executive-appointments. The order includes those roles where official sign off by the King and/or the Prime Minister is required.
In May 2020, there are 2,675 secondary academies, free schools, studio schools and university technical colleges (UTCs), out of a total of 3,453 state-funded secondary schools. This is 77% of all secondary schools. Please note that the number of secondary schools includes middle deemed secondary schools, 16+ schools, all through schools and secondary schools.
Academy trusts may comprise of either one phase of education, or multiple phases of education. The table below provides the number of academies within academy trusts that have at least one secondary academy. The number of academies within these trusts also includes primary, special and alternative provision (AP) academies, free schools, studio schools and UTCs.
Table 1: Number of academy trusts, by size of academy trust, and number of academies within those trusts
Number of academies in a trust | Number of academy trusts with one or more secondary academy | Number of primary, secondary, special and AP academies within these trusts |
1 | 786 | 786 |
2 | 138 | 276 |
3 | 106 | 318 |
4 | 77 | 308 |
5 | 72 | 360 |
More than 5 | 277 | 3574 |
Total | 1456 | 5622 |
Source: Get information about schools, taken from 1 May 2020.
In May 2020, there are 2,675 secondary academies, free schools, studio schools and university technical colleges (UTCs), out of a total of 3,453 state-funded secondary schools. This is 77% of all secondary schools. Please note that the number of secondary schools includes middle deemed secondary schools, 16+ schools, all through schools and secondary schools.
Academy trusts may comprise of either one phase of education, or multiple phases of education. The table below provides the number of academies within academy trusts that have at least one secondary academy. The number of academies within these trusts also includes primary, special and alternative provision (AP) academies, free schools, studio schools and UTCs.
Table 1: Number of academy trusts, by size of academy trust, and number of academies within those trusts
Number of academies in a trust | Number of academy trusts with one or more secondary academy | Number of primary, secondary, special and AP academies within these trusts |
1 | 786 | 786 |
2 | 138 | 276 |
3 | 106 | 318 |
4 | 77 | 308 |
5 | 72 | 360 |
More than 5 | 277 | 3574 |
Total | 1456 | 5622 |
Source: Get information about schools, taken from 1 May 2020.
The Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill goes further than Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU in a number of ways. In particular The Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill introduces a proportionate accountability mechanism, involving the Animal Sentience Committee. It applies to all policy areas and has no exemptions.
The UK spends more than £5 billion in ODA in Africa each year, through both country specific bilateral programming and through UK funding to multilateral organisations.
Details of DFID spend are contained in Statistics on International Development. The most recent publication contains provisional aid spend for 2019 and shows DFID region or country specific bilateral official development assistance (ODA) spend in Africa in 2019 was £2.448 billion.
In addition to region/country specific bilateral ODA, £2.607 billion was spent on projects where it has not been possible to assign to any single recipient country or region. A proportion of this will have been spent in Africa.
DFID’s total ODA spend in 2019 was £11.107 billion.
Spend in Africa above does not include imputed shares of UK funding to the general core budgets of multilateral organisations. The latest spend numbers available are for 2018, and show the imputed UK share of Multilateral Net ODA spent in sub-Saharan Africa was £2.2 billion.
In 2019-20 the cost of the Prime Minister’s Trade Envoy Programme was £651,387. All costs incurred are subject to departmental restrictions and guidelines which apply to the programme’s use of public funds.
There are currently 36 Trade Envoys. A full list including their political affiliation is below.
| Trade Envoy | Political party |
1 | Andrew Selous | Conservative (1) |
2 | Baroness Hooper | Conservative (1) |
3 | Baroness Meyer | Conservative (1) |
4 | Baroness Morris of Bolton | Conservative (1) |
5 | Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne | Conservative (1) |
6 | Conor Burns | Conservative (1) |
7 | Damien Moore | Conservative (1) |
8 | Daniel Kawczynski | Conservative (1) |
9 | Darren Henry | Conservative (1) |
10 | David Mundell | Conservative (1) |
11 | Dr. Andrew Murrison | Conservative (1) |
12 | Felicity Buchan | Conservative (1) |
13 | Heather Wheeler | Conservative (1) |
14 | Helen Grant | Conservative (1) |
15 | Katherine Fletcher | Conservative (1) |
16 | Laurence Robertson | Conservative (1) |
17 | Lord Astor of Hever | Conservative (1) |
18 | Lord Lamont | Conservative (1) |
19 | Lord Popat | Conservative (1) |
20 | Lord Risby of Haverhill | Conservative (1) |
21 | Marco Longhi | Conservative (1) |
22 | Mark Eastwood | Conservative (1) |
23 | Mark Garnier | Conservative (1) |
24 | Mark Menzies | Conservative (1) |
25 | Martin Vickers | Conservative (1) |
26 | Richard Graham | Conservative (1) |
27 | Theo Clarke | Conservative (1) |
28 | Lord Faulkner | Labour (2) |
29 | Rushanara Ali | Labour (2) |
30 | Stephen Timms | Labour (2) |
31 | Lord Botham | Crossbench (4) |
32 | Baroness Hoey | Non-affiliated (5) |
33 | Lord Austin | Non-affiliated (5) |
34 | Lord Davies of Abersoch | Non-affiliated (5) |
35 | Lord Walney | Non-affiliated (5) |
36 | Sir Jeffrey Donaldson | Democratic Unionist Party |
There has been no change in title or accountability of the ‘Prime Minister’s Trade Envoys’, however the formal title is occasionally shortened to ‘Trade Envoys’ for brevity.
The Prime Minister’s Trade Envoy Programme supports British businesses overseas and attracts investment into the UK. The programme works in collaboration with other trade promotion activities, and it focuses on emerging and high growth markets where additional senior interactions can be valuable, or larger economies where multiple interactions at different levels are effective. Trade Envoys are appointed to markets where there are opportunities to increase bilateral trade.
The Department for International Trade is constantly reviewing suitable countries, regions, and markets to identify where the appointment of a Trade Envoy can be of greatest benefit to the trade and investment aims of the UK, with the Prime Minister ultimately making the decision to appoint.
In addition to our deal with the EU, we have secured trade agreements with 66 non-EU countries, covering £890 billion of trade in total (2019 data). These are:
Albania;
Antigua and Barbuda;
Barbados;
The Bahamas;
Belize;
Botswana;
Cameroon;
Canada;
Colombia;
Côte d’Ivoire (The Ivory Coast);
Costa Rica;
Chile;
Dominica;
The Dominican Republic;
Ecuador;
Egypt;
El Salvador;
Eswatini (Swaziland);
The Faroe Islands;
Fiji;
Ghana;
Grenada;
Guyana;
Guatemala;
Georgia;
Honduras;
Iceland;
Israel;
Japan;
Jordan;
Jamaica;
Kenya;
Kosovo;
Lebanon;
Lesotho;
Liechtenstein;
Mexico;
Morocco;
Moldova;
Mozambique;
Mauritius;
Nicaragua;
Norway;
North Macedonia;
Namibia;
Peru;
Panama;
Papua New Guinea;
The Palestinian Authority;
Saint Lucia;
St. Vincent and the Grenadines;
Samoa;
The Solomon Islands;
St. Kitts and Nevis;
The Seychelles;
South Africa;
Switzerland;
Singapore;
South Korea;
Suriname;
Trinidad and Tobago;
Tunisia;
Turkey;
Ukraine;
Vietnam; and
Zimbabwe.
We have secured trade agreements with 64 non-EU countries. Total trade with these countries was worth £216 billion in 2019. This accounts for 97% of the value of trade with non-EU countries that we set out to secure agreements with at the start of the trade continuity programme.
After the transition period began, we expanded the ambition of our programme above and beyond this original scope, securing agreements with Japan, Turkey, Vietnam and Singapore, which together accounted for £71 billion of trade in 2019.
All countries with which the United Kingdom has a trade deal are set out on GOV.UK.
There are currently 30 Trade Envoys. A full list including their date of appointment, assigned markets and political affiliation is attached.
A written ministerial statement was laid in both Houses on Monday, 5th October listing all the Prime Minister’s Trade Envoys. We have no plans to publish further information on party or group as this is already in the public domain.
As noted in the Parliamentary Report published in November 2023, to date £1bn (2019 prices) has been spent on the Phase 2a leg of HS2.
Under the Network North announcement, the Government has committed to delivering both schemes, both of which could be delivered quicker than Phase 2b of HS2 which was due to complete in 2041.
This is set out in the latest Parliamentary Report on HS2. The Department will continue to work with HS2 Ltd to bring early / enabling site activities to a safe stop and conclude any land remediation activities for the handing back of sites.
Information related to the spend to date on HS2, including Phase 2b Western Leg, was provided in the most recent Parliamentary Report published in November 2023.
To date, £0.7bn (2019 prices) has been spent on the Phase 2b Western Leg of the HS2 Programme. This funding was used to prepare the Phase 2b Western Leg Bill. Following the Network North announcement, Government is now considering options to repurpose this Bill in order to deliver Northern Powerhouse Rail.
The Department for Transport remains committed to providing regular updates to Parliament on the progress of the Programme with a further update expected in Spring 2024.
Following the Network North announcement, the Department for Transport is in the early stages of planning next steps, including delivery timelines, for individual schemes and is working closely with Network Rail and other delivery partners to develop and deliver on Government priorities. Further information will be set out in due course.
The full list of rail infrastructure schemes has been published on gov.uk and can be found by searching for the title ‘Network North: transforming British transport’.
Officials are in the early stages of planning, including delivery timelines and estimated costs, for these schemes and are working closely with Network Rail and other partners to develop and deliver these Government priorities.
All schemes will be subject to the development and approval of business cases and will undergo all formal governance, in line with relevant fiscal and legal duties.