Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park

Main Page: Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Conservative - Life peer)

Oral Answers to Questions

Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park Excerpts
Monday 30th January 2012

(12 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Grant Shapps Portrait Grant Shapps
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

A whole range of protections is in place, including the fact that people can choose to bridge the gap themselves. If they cannot do that, a discretionary fund of £190 million is available. If that does not work, by definition a third of properties within the local housing area are available. There are just some decisions that cannot be delayed, and it must be right that people who are in receipt of different types of benefits, whether social housing or housing benefit, have to make the same decisions as people who rent or own privately.

Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park Portrait Zac Goldsmith (Richmond Park) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Many of my constituents are wondering what the point is of local elections when so many decisions taken by the elected local authority, and supported by the majority of people, are simply overruled by remote authorities. Given that the referendum clause has been deleted from the Localism Bill, what hope can my constituents have that we will see a genuine shift in favour of local democracy?

Lord Stunell Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Andrew Stunell)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I draw my hon. Friend’s attention to the referendum carried out in Salford last Thursday. Local residents convened a referendum on whether the local authority’s system of governance should be changed and got a positive result. It is entirely possible for local residents to take control of the governance of their local authorities should they wish to do so.