Information between 14th January 2024 - 9th November 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 201 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 249 Noes - 219 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 205 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 263 Noes - 233 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 203 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 226 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 196 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 209 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 208 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 230 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 203 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 228 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 200 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 251 Noes - 214 |
23 May 2024 - Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Bill - View Vote Context Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 108 Conservative No votes vs 13 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 111 |
16 Jan 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 195 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 102 Noes - 212 |
11 Sep 2024 - Social Fund Winter Fuel Payment Regulations 2024 - View Vote Context Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 164 Noes - 132 |
Speeches |
---|
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park speeches from: Environment and Climate Change Committee Report: An Extraordinary Challenge: Restoring 30 per cent of our Land and Sea by 2030
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park contributed 1 speech (1,969 words) Wednesday 11th September 2024 - Grand Committee Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park speeches from: Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [HL]
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park contributed 2 speeches (1,541 words) Report stage Tuesday 16th January 2024 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
Written Answers |
---|
Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership
Asked by: Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 11th September 2024 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to carry out a monitoring report of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, including its environmental impact and impact on deforestation; whether they will include opportunities for expert stakeholders to provide their views and evidence; and how often they plan to carry out such a report. Answered by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Department for Business and Trade intends to cover the UK’s accession to the CPTPP Agreement in a Free Trade Agreement monitoring report. The Department will consider a range of areas for inclusion in this report, including the environment, and it will take account of stakeholder views. The timing of the report will be provided in due course. |
Forests: Commodities
Asked by: Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 16th September 2024 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government when they plan to introduce secondary legislation under Schedule 17 to the Environment Act 2021; and what plans they have to review the regulations once implemented. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Environment Act includes provisions to make it illegal for larger businesses operating in the UK to use key commodities that have been grown on land that is illegally occupied or used, but the required secondary legislation to operationalise the scheme was not introduced in the last Parliament. The new Government will set out its approach to addressing the use of forest risk commodities in due course. |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Environment and Climate Change Committee Report: An Extraordinary Challenge: Restoring 30 per cent of our Land and Sea by 2030
48 speeches (26,445 words) Wednesday 11th September 2024 - Grand Committee Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Mentions: 1: Lord Gascoigne (Con - Life peer) successful COPs in both Glasgow and Montreal; this goes especially to my very good and noble friends Lord - Link to Speech 2: Lord Blencathra (Con - Life peer) They made excellent points, including in the superb speech by my noble friend Lord Goldsmith of Richmond - Link to Speech |
Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [HL]
85 speeches (24,478 words) Report stage Tuesday 16th January 2024 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville (LD - Life peer) again essential.I shall also speak briefly in support of Amendment 11 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord - Link to Speech 2: None Goldsmith of Richmond Park. - Link to Speech 3: Lord McNicol of West Kilbride (Lab - Life peer) Goldsmith of Richmond Park. - Link to Speech |
Written Answers |
---|
Sudan: Refugees
Asked by: Baroness Goudie (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 15th May 2024 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to remarks by Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park on 24 May 2023 (HL Deb col 870), when the initial £5 million, including £2 million in South Sudan, to meet the urgent needs of refugees and returnees who were fleeing the violence in Sudan was released; and on what it has been spent. Answered by Lord Benyon - Lord Chamberlain (HM Household) On 4 May 2023, the UK Government announced an initial £5 million allocation to support those fleeing the conflict in Sudan. In Chad, this included £1.75 million for the World Food Programme on food and logistics ahead of the rainy season and £1 million to the Sahel Regional Fund to support urgent protection and assistance by NGOs. In South Sudan, this included £1.5 million to the World Food Programme for use in border areas, £500,000 to UNICEF for Sexual and Gender Based Violence protection services and £250,000 to REACH towards initiatives to improve analysis about evolving needs to support wider humanitarian action. In total, since the outbreak of conflict in Sudan, the UK has allocated £15 million to support those fleeing to Chad, and £7.75 million to support existing and new Sudanese refugees as well as vulnerable returnees and host communities in South Sudan. |
Parliamentary Research |
---|
Freedom of religion or belief in Nigeria - CDP-2024-0024
Feb. 01 2024 Found: Answering member: Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park | Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office |
International affairs and defence: Parliamentary debates and statements in the 2022-23 session - CBP-9824
Jan. 17 2024 Found: Goldsmith of Richmond Park (FCDO) 11 May 2023 732 cc500- 31 Overseas Territories Motion that |
Non-Departmental Publications - Transparency |
---|
May. 14 2024
Forestry Commission Source Page: Board of Commissioners meeting, 25 July 2022 Document: (PDF) Transparency Found: www.gov.uk/defra | +44 (0) 3459 335577 www.gov.uk/sustainabledevelopmentgoals The Rt Hon the Lord |