Tuesday 5th July 2022

(2 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Callanan Portrait Lord Callanan (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord will not be surprised to know that I do not agree with him. We did consult the trade unions; in fact, the TUC submitted a petition of 25,000 names against the proposals, so they clearly had a chance to comment. We will of course consult Parliament when the regulations are debated.

Lord Fox Portrait Lord Fox (LD)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, there is a huge workforce crisis across the United Kingdom and a shortage of people. Does the Minister not believe that, rather than using agencies to cross picket lines, he should be working with agencies and other groups to try to plug the hole in Britain’s workforce?

Lord Callanan Portrait Lord Callanan (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am not sure of the point the noble Lord is making. We want to work with all the appropriate agencies to, as the noble Lord says, plug the hole in the workforce.

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Callanan Portrait Lord Callanan (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

This is not specifically targeted at the current rail strikes. The regulations will apply to all sectors of the economy, not just the rail sector.

Lord Fox Portrait Lord Fox (LD)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Woodley, mentioned the letter that the heads of the major agencies wrote to the Secretary of State. In that letter they said:

“we can only see these proposals inflaming strikes—not ending them.”

Will the Government take the advice of these experts in employment and back down from this measure?

Lord Callanan Portrait Lord Callanan (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

If agencies do not wish to take part in the freedoms offered by these regulations then it is entirely their right not to do so.