Business of the House Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Leader of the House
Wednesday 4th September 2019

(4 years, 7 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
The procedure that the Opposition are backing today is not only a constitutional outrage but a two-edged sword. If there is one thing worse, on any account, than a no-deal Brexit, it would be a Government led by Mr Corbyn. Those who are so keen to protect, as they see it, the security of the British public by blocking no deal and stopping Brexit are not so keen to protect the country, and ethnic minorities in particular, from an extreme left-wing Government. Those of us who care about the reputation of the House, of its role, its respect, its standing and its future, and about the quality and effect of draft legislation, are calling for this procedural impropriety and guillotine to be rejected, now and in the future. I beg to move.
Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker (Lord Fowler)
- Hansard - -

I inform the House that if Amendment 1 is agreed I cannot call any other amendments by reason of pre-emption.

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Stoneham of Droxford Portrait Lord Stoneham of Droxford
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That the Question be now put.

Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker
- Hansard - -

I am instructed by order of the House to say that the Motion “That the Question be now put” is considered to be a most exceptional procedure and the House will not accept it save in circumstances where it is felt to be the only means of ensuring the proper conduct of the business of the House. Further, if a Member who seeks to move it persists in his intention, the practice of the House is that the Question on the Motion is put without debate. Does the noble Lord still wish to move the closure Motion?

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean Portrait Lord Forsyth of Drumlean
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, I am. And they did so with the aid of the Speaker, who has acted in a way that is, to say the least, somewhat novel. It is an important point, because those Standing Orders in this House and the other place are our constitution, and if they are to be torn up or changed by people who do not accept the result of what the people and Parliament—both Houses by a big majority—voted for, that is a crisis, and it is a far bigger crisis than anything that arises from having a longer period of Prorogation.

Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker
- Hansard - -

My Lords, we really need to have a Question before us, otherwise we are having a debate at this stage. The noble Baroness has now been on her feet, or around her feet, for about 23 minutes. It is the custom to use this not for debate but to put a Question.

Baroness Noakes Portrait Baroness Noakes
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I say to the Lord Speaker that I have not been encouraging the debate but trying to introduce and speak to my amendment. Of course, other noble Lords have wished to raise a number of other matters, and obviously I feel it necessary to let noble Lords have an opportunity to have their say on those things.

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Harris of Haringey Portrait Lord Harris of Haringey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, since we have already had a de facto debate, I move that the Question be now put.

Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker
- Hansard - -

I am instructed by order of the House to say that the Motion “That the Question be now put” is considered to be a most exceptional procedure and the House will not accept it save in circumstances where it is felt to be the only means of ensuring the proper conduct of the business of the House. Further, if a Member who seeks to move it persists in his intention, the practice of the House is that the Question on the Motion is put without debate. Does the noble Lord still wish to move the Motion?

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Harris of Haringey Portrait Lord Harris of Haringey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I beg to move that the Question be now put.

Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker
- Hansard - -

Is this a suitable time to intervene before the closure Motion?

None Portrait Noble Lords
- Hansard -

No.

Motion

Lord Harris of Haringey Portrait Lord Harris of Haringey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That the Question be now put.

Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker
- Hansard - -

I am instructed by order of the House to say that the Motion “That the Question be now put” is considered to be a most exceptional procedure and the House will not accept it save in circumstances where it is felt to be the only means of ensuring the proper conduct of the business of the House. Further, if a Member who seeks to move it persists in his intention, the practice of the House is that the Question on the Motion is put without debate. Does the noble Lord still wish to move the Motion?

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Warner Portrait Lord Warner
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I suggest that the Question be now put.

Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker
- Hansard - -

I am instructed by order of the House to say that the Motion “That the Question be now put” is considered to be a most exceptional procedure and the House will not accept it save in circumstances where it is felt to be the only means of ensuring the proper conduct of the business of the House. Further, if a Member who seeks to move it persists in his intention, the practice of the House is that the Question on the Motion is put without debate. Does the noble Lord still wish to move the Motion?