Debates between Lord Forsyth of Drumlean and Viscount Hailsham during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Tue 7th Mar 2017
European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill
Lords Chamber

Report stage (Hansard - continued): House of Lords
Wed 16th Mar 2016

European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill

Debate between Lord Forsyth of Drumlean and Viscount Hailsham
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean Portrait Lord Forsyth of Drumlean
- Hansard - -

It is not the Prime Minister’s proposal. It is a ridiculous proposal to say that the Prime Minister may not conclude an agreement until this has been sorted.

Viscount Hailsham Portrait Viscount Hailsham
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Would my noble friend give way?

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean Portrait Lord Forsyth of Drumlean
- Hansard - -

No, I am not going to give way to my noble friend.

Trade Union Bill

Debate between Lord Forsyth of Drumlean and Viscount Hailsham
Wednesday 16th March 2016

(8 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Viscount Hailsham Portrait Viscount Hailsham
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Notwithstanding my considerable respect for the noble Lord, Lord Burns, and my noble friend Lord Cormack, now my near neighbour, and indeed the noble Lord, Lord Tyler, I am not with them on the amendment.

The amendment is in paragraph 142 of the Select Committee report. I am an advocate of the alternative view: a generous transitional period for existing members. I should like to think that the Minister will offer a more generous transitional period than she is presently contemplating. I cannot help feeling that, if she did, she would attract considerable support.

My reasons are very simple and can be briefly expressed. First, as a matter of principle, existing members should be covered by the opt-in provisions. The noble Baroness, Lady Drake, referred to the amendment as fair and even-handed. It is nothing of the kind. It actually deprives existing members of the greater ability to opt out, if they want to. There is nothing fair or even-handed about the amendment; it has a contrary effect.

However, I agree with another point made by the noble Lord, Lord Burns, and, incidentally, my noble friend Lord Cormack: that it would unbalance party funding. That is not in the general interests of the country or, therefore, within the general consent of this House. I therefore think that the alternative approach formulated in paragraph 142(b) of the Select Committee report is the way forward. A more generous transitional period for existing members seems to me to catch the sense of the House.

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean Portrait Lord Forsyth of Drumlean
- Hansard - -

What does my noble friend mean by a generous period, because, clearly, if it were 10 years or five years, that would be a completely different argument?

Viscount Hailsham Portrait Viscount Hailsham
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That, truth to tell, is a matter of negotiation. My noble friend Lord Forsyth and I have often negotiated in the past. When one seeks a compromise, one negotiates: one sees what will meet the general will. I cannot go further than that. One problem with the amendment moved by the noble Lord, Lord Burns, is that it does not contemplate an active moment when existing members will be covered by the new provisions. That matter also needs to be addressed and is wholly uncovered by the terms of his amendment.

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean Portrait Lord Forsyth of Drumlean
- Hansard - -

I am very grateful to my noble friend, but he cannot stand up and say, “We ought to have a more generous period”, and then not say what he thinks will be workable.

Viscount Hailsham Portrait Viscount Hailsham
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Of course I can—I am not the Minister, nor am I in the business of negotiating. When we were on the Front Bench together, we often had to negotiate about policy, one with the other. If I was in the business of negotiating, I would have a proposition to put forward. All I am saying to the Minister is that, if she were to be generous in her approach, I suspect that would get a lot of support in this House.