All 1 Lord Faulkner of Worcester contributions to the Bus Services Act 2017

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Wed 23rd Nov 2016
Bus Services Bill [HL]
Lords Chamber

3rd reading (Hansard): House of Lords

Bus Services Bill [HL] Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Transport

Bus Services Bill [HL]

Lord Faulkner of Worcester Excerpts
3rd reading (Hansard): House of Lords
Wednesday 23rd November 2016

(7 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Bus Services Act 2017 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: HL Bill 67-I Marshalled list for Third Reading (PDF, 65KB) - (22 Nov 2016)
Lord Bradshaw Portrait Lord Bradshaw
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am perfectly satisfied with what the Minister has said in so far as it concerns bus franchising, but the bus and rail industries are very much linked together. I am trying to bring to his attention the fact that the work of the CMA in the latest case has probably been fruitless. It has been very expensive and, in future, rail franchising should be subject to the same discipline now proposed for bus services. With that, I should like to withdraw the amendment.

Lord Faulkner of Worcester Portrait The Deputy Speaker (Lord Faulkner of Worcester) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

It may be for the convenience of noble Lords if I remind the House that we are debating government Amendment 1, and the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, has been speaking to Amendments 4 and 5, which are grouped with that amendment.

Baroness Scott of Needham Market Portrait Baroness Scott of Needham Market (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing his amendment, which closely mirrors one that I brought forward in Committee what seems like quite a long time ago. The success of the Bill will to a very large extent be determined by the attitude of the Competition and Markets Authority. In its advice to government, it has made it clear that it sees this form of franchising very much as an inferior form of competition compared to on-road competition. That is an attitude I find extraordinary. After all, we do not have on-road bin collection competition, with companies whizzing around fighting over who collects the bins. We accept that, under those circumstances, it is a perfectly rational thing to do—and there is absolutely a case to be made with buses. The problem is with the insistence that it must be the only way, which is likely to prove a hurdle that most local authorities will simply not be able to reach. I am very keen that this amendment should go through, not because it can do anything to halt the CMA but because if it is cited at an early stage and then has a problem, at least it will become clear to the franchising authority very quickly. That authority would not spend a huge amount of money on developing a scheme that is likely to fall foul of the CMA later.