Armed Forces: Redundancies Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Defence

Armed Forces: Redundancies

Lord Davies of Stamford Excerpts
Thursday 20th June 2013

(11 years, 5 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Astor of Hever Portrait Lord Astor of Hever
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, all personnel who have been graded permanently below the minimum medical retention standard were exempt from redundancy and, where appropriate, will be medically discharged in due course. Every case of wounded, injured or sick will be assessed individually. No one will leave the Armed Forces through redundancy or otherwise until they have reached a point in their recovery where leaving is the right decision, however long it takes.

Lord Davies of Stamford Portrait Lord Davies of Stamford
- Hansard - -

My Lords, is it not disingenuous and absurd to suggest that you can reduce the Army from 102,000 to 82,000 with no reduction in the nation’s defence capability? Will the noble Lord set out the figures clearly and frankly? What was the maximum military force that we were able to sustain over a number of years—for example in Iraq or Afghanistan—with an Army of 102,000, and what will be the maximum military force that we can deploy on a sustainable basis under the new arrangements for an Army of 82,000?

Lord Astor of Hever Portrait Lord Astor of Hever
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, this was not being disingenuous. This level of capability was agreed by the SDSR and the National Security Council.