Armed Services: War Crimes Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Justice

Armed Services: War Crimes

Lord Dannatt Excerpts
Tuesday 1st March 2016

(8 years, 2 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Faulks Portrait Lord Faulks
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am happy to do that when I have the relevant information to hand.

Lord Dannatt Portrait Lord Dannatt (CB)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, given that there can be no blanket, technical explanation for these circumstances, is the Minister prepared to give an undertaking that where a soldier, sailor or airman acts in palpable good faith, there will be a presumption by the Government to stand with him and behind him in his defence against any action that might be taken against him?

Lord Faulks Portrait Lord Faulks
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Government always stand behind our soldiers but to give a blanket undertaking like that would be exceeding my authority. With regard to battlefield immunity, which the noble Lord may be referring to, combat immunity remains part of the common law, although its contours are rather unclear at the moment, particularly in light of the Smith v Ministry of Defence case about the interrelationship of the Human Rights Act and that immunity. These are matters on which the Prime Minister and the Government are profoundly exercised.