Planning: Onshore Wind Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Cormack

Main Page: Lord Cormack (Conservative - Life peer)

Planning: Onshore Wind

Lord Cormack Excerpts
Thursday 6th June 2013

(10 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Hanham Portrait Baroness Hanham
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, this does not change what the National Planning Policy Framework lays out at the moment. It advises that local people should be consulted about major planning applications. The Statement says that it will be amended so that they must be consulted. That then makes it a material consideration for the decision on planning applications and must be taken into account. Whether that increases or decreases the number of approvals given will become clearer, but, one way or the other, it seems to us essential that local people, who will feel the impact of wind farms—indeed, who already have experience of them—have a proper say on any future proposal.

Lord Cormack Portrait Lord Cormack
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I express the hope that localism will be more than tokenism here. Much as I welcome what my noble friend said, does she accept that the vast majority of onshore wind farms are uneconomic, unreliable and very unsightly?

Baroness Hanham Portrait Baroness Hanham
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I am sure that my noble friend does not really expect me to say any of that. I can only repeat that we are trying to ensure that they are acceptable, aesthetic and take into account people’s views. I should also make it clear that this guidance and the Statement refer to England, not the whole of the United Kingdom.