Hong Kong Protests Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Collins of Highbury

Main Page: Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour - Life peer)

Hong Kong Protests

Lord Collins of Highbury Excerpts
Tuesday 2nd July 2019

(4 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Collins of Highbury Portrait Lord Collins of Highbury (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I thank the Minister for repeating that Statement. I welcome the acknowledgement by the Government that they reject the notion by the Chinese Government that the agreement is a historic document, but yesterday’s editorial in the state-run China Daily said that Hong Kong is an “inalienable” part of China and that its affairs concern China only. There is no doubt that China appears to be moving to a ‘one country, one system’ position, using these incidents to tighten its grip on Hong Kong. Will the noble Baroness outline what the next steps are for this Government in terms of upholding our obligation to that legally binding agreement? We need to hear more than simply kind words. The people of Hong Kong deserve better.

Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I make it clear that the joint declaration remains as valid today as it did when it was signed over 35 years ago. It is a legally binding international treaty registered with the United Nations. We do not want to become hysterical. We do not consider that recent events represent a breach of the joint declaration. Having said that, we expect China to uphold that declaration. It is legally binding until 2047, and we would pursue a breach bilaterally if such a breach were to occur. We are perfectly clear about the status of that joint declaration, and we are perfectly clear that it endures until 2047.