Information between 15th March 2025 - 25th March 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 24th March 2025 Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour - Life peer) Statement - Main Chamber Subject: Conflict in Gaza’ View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
24 Mar 2025 - Local Authorities (Changes to Years of Ordinary Elections) (England) Order 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 145 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 152 |
|
24 Mar 2025 - Local Authorities (Changes to Years of Ordinary Elections) (England) Order 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 63 Noes - 163 |
|
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 172 |
|
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165 |
|
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 157 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 173 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 135 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 141 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 157 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 165 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 158 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 283 Noes - 177 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 179 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 339 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 229 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 237 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 183 Noes - 234 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Collins of Highbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 207 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Collins of Highbury speeches from: Conflict in Gaza
Lord Collins of Highbury contributed 10 speeches (2,177 words) Monday 24th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House |
|
Lord Collins of Highbury speeches from: Gaza: Ceasefire
Lord Collins of Highbury contributed 11 speeches (1,223 words) Tuesday 18th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House |
|
Lord Collins of Highbury speeches from: Media Freedom Coalition
Lord Collins of Highbury contributed 8 speeches (788 words) Monday 17th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
European Convention on Human Rights: 75th Anniversary
61 speeches (22,137 words) Thursday 20th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Mentions: 1: Lord Rook (Lab - Life peer) grateful for the leadership of our Government in this area, for the work of my noble friends Lord Collins of Highbury - Link to Speech |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Stonewall: Membership
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 24th March 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Collins of Highbury on 25 February (HL5027), whether the (1) Serious Fraud Office, (2) Independent Office for Police Conduct, and (3) National Crime Agency, are paid members or affiliates of Stonewall. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) The Independent Office for Police Conduct is a paid member of Stonewall. The Serious Fraud Office and National Crime Agency are neither members nor affiliates of Stonewall. |
|
Armed Forces: Stonewall
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 19th March 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Collins of Highbury on 25 February (HL5027), whether any of the Army, the Royal Navy, or the Royal Airforce are paid members or affiliates of Stonewall. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) I can confirm that neither the Royal Navy, the Army, nor the Royal Air Force are paid members or affiliates of Stonewall. |
|
Stonewall: Membership
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 19th March 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Collins of Highbury on 25 February (HL5027), whether the (1) Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, (2) Government Legal Department, and (3) Government Recruitment Service, are paid members or affiliates of Stonewall. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Neither the Government Legal Department nor the Government Recruitment Service are paid members or affiliates of Stonewall. The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman is independent of Government and we do not therefore hold information on any of its memberships or affiliations. |
|
Human Rights: Armed Conflict
Asked by: Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour - Life peer) Monday 17th March 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Collins of Highbury on 17 February (HL4711), what steps they are taking to address dehumanisation in situations of conflict. Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The UK is committed to protecting those most at risk in situations of conflict. Promoting compliance with International Humanitarian Law is a cornerstone of our commitment to the rule of law and the UK calls on all parties to a conflict to observe robust standards. |
|
Stonewall: Membership
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 17th March 2025 Question To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Collins of Highbury on 25 February (HL5027), whether any of UK Government Investments, the Crown Estate, or the Intellectual Property Office are paid members or affiliates of Stonewall. Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) None of these organisations are paid members or affiliates of Stonewall.
|