International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for International Development

International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Bill

Lord Collins of Highbury Excerpts
Friday 6th February 2015

(9 years, 2 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean Portrait Lord Forsyth of Drumlean
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I apologise if my noble friend thought I was referring to her. I was referring to the Opposition.

Lord Collins of Highbury Portrait Lord Collins of Highbury (Lab)
- Hansard - -

That does not make it better.

Baroness Northover Portrait Baroness Northover
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Being somewhat short, I could not see who was over there and who my noble friend might have been addressing.

Obviously I take very seriously what my noble friends have put forward. I emphasise that the commitment to invest 0.7% of GNI in ODA is an international commitment that is reported to and monitored by the Development Assistance Committee of the OECD. The UK reports on this basis to the DAC, allowing comparison across donors. To aim at an alternative ODA target for the United Kingdom based on GDP would not only lead to multiple definitions, but create confusion. It would also undermine our intention to fulfil our international commitments. This is an international target; it would reduce our credibility and moral weight that our commitment to the 0.7% target carries with our international partners—I have encountered widespread support for the move to the 0.7% target that we have taken—which would limit our ability to press other donors to meet their obligations, for example, to the Global Fund, which my noble friend Lord Fowler mentioned. This would not be helpful or in the spirit of our commitment to the world’s poorest. Gross national income became the preferred measure of measuring a country’s wealth in 1993.