Ukraine: Depleted Uranium Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Campbell of Pittenweem

Main Page: Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Thursday 30th March 2023

(1 year, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate
Lord Harlech Portrait Lord Harlech (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the noble Lord for his comments and I shall definitely do so.

Lord Campbell of Pittenweem Portrait Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The Minister mentioned the United Nations but did not take account of its report, which says that the use of this ammunition is likely to cause chemical toxicity, which can result in skin irritation and kidney failure. Is he aware of that report? The other point is this: have we not handed Mr Putin an ill-founded but successful propaganda opportunity to claim falsely that the allies are seeking to introduce a nuclear element to the conflict? Who authorised the use, and indeed the supply, of this ammunition? Who took account of the possible public responses which people such as Mr Putin might take advantage of?

Lord Harlech Portrait Lord Harlech (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I reiterate that multiple scientific bodies, including the UN, have studied this at length and concluded that there are no, or minimal, risks of long-term health effects from exposure to DU. On the point about Putin’s posturing, he is simply trying to deter our support for the forces of Ukraine. It is fundamental that we supply Ukrainian forces with these rounds, due to their armour-piercing capabilities, so that those forces can engage Russian adversaries from further distances.