Debates between Lord Bishop of St Albans and Earl of Courtown during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Fly-tipping

Debate between Lord Bishop of St Albans and Earl of Courtown
Wednesday 8th March 2017

(7 years, 2 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Bishop of St Albans Portrait The Lord Bishop of St Albans
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I beg leave to ask the Question standing in my name on the Order Paper. In so doing, I express my regret that I could not find a suitable topic for International Women’s Day.

Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, fly-tipping blights communities and poses a risk to human health and the environment. Tackling this issue is a priority for the Government. As set out in our manifesto, we have given councils the power to issue fixed penalty notices for small-scale fly-tipping. This builds on previous action, including giving authorities the power to seize and crush vehicles involved, strengthening sentencing guidelines for environmental offences and publishing a revised Waste Duty of Care Code of Practice.

Lord Bishop of St Albans Portrait The Lord Bishop of St Albans
- Hansard - -

I thank the Minister for his reply, but clearly the existing powers are simply not working. Figures issued by Defra just last week show that the incidence of reported fly-tipping increased by 4% last year, while the amount that Her Majesty’s Government spent on both prevention and prosecution fell by 4%. Given that many people consider that high levels of landfill taxation are a contributory factor to the increase in fly-tipping, will Her Majesty’s Government consider the possibility of increasing the level of money for enforcement action against waste crime funded from this tax?

Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I thank the right reverend Prelate for that question. I should point out that the statistics of increases of 4% in the incidence of fly-tipping have to be looked at very carefully, because different local authorities gather these statistics in different ways. It would be useful to examine how these figures look this time next year because the power for local authorities to issue fixed penalty notices came in only in May 2016, so we would like to think there will be some effect on this issue next year. The right reverend Prelate also mentioned landfill tax. I will take careful note of what he said, but as he is aware, this goes into central government.

Gambling: B2 Gaming Machines

Debate between Lord Bishop of St Albans and Earl of Courtown
Tuesday 15th March 2016

(8 years, 2 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Bishop of St Albans Portrait The Lord Bishop of St Albans
- Hansard - -



To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the social impact of category B2 gaming machines.

Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the Government draw upon a range of sources to monitor the social impact of gambling, not least the Gambling Commission and the health surveys that are commissioned by the NHS. The Government also evaluate the effects of their own regulations, most recently the £50 gaming machine regulations, which indicate that a large proportion of players on B2 gaming machines may now be making a more conscious choice to control their playing behaviour.

Lord Bishop of St Albans Portrait The Lord Bishop of St Albans
- Hansard - -

I thank the Minister for his reply. These gaming machines, also known as FOBTs, have been dubbed the “crack cocaine of gambling”. The Government have consistently said that they would take action on their use if and when evidence of their social and personal harm became readily available. Yet it was reported in the media that last year the Government blocked a targeted review which had been requested by the DCMS. In the light of the tragic stories that continue to appear all too frequently in the media of the harm caused by these machines, will the Government now commit to a full, targeted review of FOBTs and their use?

Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the right reverend Prelate will be aware that in January of this year we published an evaluation of the impact of the April 2015 regulations. Ministers will consider the findings carefully before deciding on the next steps, including the possible timing of the next review of stakes and prizes.

National Minimum Wage

Debate between Lord Bishop of St Albans and Earl of Courtown
Monday 19th October 2015

(8 years, 7 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Bishop of St Albans Portrait The Lord Bishop of St Albans
- Hansard - -

My Lords, while welcoming the Government’s moves to look at the level of wages as the Minister has mentioned in terms of the minimum living wage, I am aware that the Resolution Foundation is concerned about very small businesses—those that employ fewer than 10 people. Its research indicates that this is likely to add roughly 1.5% to wage bills. What are Her Majesty’s Government doing to mitigate those effects—for example, by cutting red tape and by offering extra assistance to boost productivity—so that we can look forward with confidence to the Government’s wishes being delivered?

Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, we are continuing to look at all matters that affect small and medium-sized enterprises. As I understand the current situation, national insurance contributions are being cut for those that employ four people or fewer.