Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Oral Answers to Questions

Lord Beith Excerpts
Thursday 17th October 2013

(10 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Michael Fallon Portrait Michael Fallon
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We have reduced the support for onshore wind projects from April this year and the draft strike prices that we have set out are reduced over time up until 2018, but the new planning policy framework makes it clear that local authorities should have policies in place to ensure that any adverse impacts, including visual impacts and cumulative impacts, are addressed satisfactorily. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government has made it clear that he intends now to call in more applications at appeal to ensure that the new planning practice guidance is meeting the Government’s intentions.

Lord Beith Portrait Sir Alan Beith (Berwick-upon-Tweed) (LD)
- Hansard - -

May I advise the Minister that while the incentives are clearly proving sufficient to encourage a number of prominent local Conservatives to apply for wind farms to be built on land in Northumberland, what concerns many of my constituents is whether landscape, which the Minister mentioned, and proximity to residences can be taken properly into account at every stage in the planning process?

Michael Fallon Portrait Michael Fallon
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes. I want to reassure my right hon. Friend. Planning applications in respect of onshore wind should be approved only if the impacts are acceptable to the local community. The new planning guidance from the Department for Communities and Local Government helps to deliver the balance that we expect, ensuring that proper weight is given to the visual impact, the cumulative impact and any heritage implications for particular sites.