Monetary Policy Committee Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury

Monetary Policy Committee

Lord Barnett Excerpts
Wednesday 16th February 2011

(13 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
None Portrait The Commercial Secretary to the Treasury (Lord Sassoon)
- Hansard -

My Lords, Her Majesty’s Government have no proposals to change the relationship between the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Governor of the Bank of England in his capacity as chairman of the Monetary Policy Committee.

Lord Barnett Portrait Lord Barnett
- Hansard - -

I welcome the Answer from the noble Lord, but does it include what the Chancellor told the Treasury Select Committee; namely, that he is going to follow the policy of the previous Chancellor, which would not prevent him reducing or increasing quantitative easing, although he has the powers? Then again, the governor also said in his letter to the Chancellor, published on 14 February, that he believed that inflation would have been below the 2 per cent target if it had not been for three exceptional factors. Does the noble Lord agree with that because the Chancellor’s letter is somewhat unclear to say the least? As to the balance of risk that the governor was writing about, he seemed to be worried about the problems for growth and employment if he increased interest rates. Does the noble Lord agree with that?

Lord Sassoon Portrait Lord Sassoon
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, first, it is for the Bank of England to make any proposals on quantitative easing if and when it wants to, and the Chancellor will then look at them. I am certainly not going to deconstruct and provide a commentary on the exchange of letters yesterday. However, the noble Lord, Lord Barnett, indeed identifies some of the points made by the governor in the letter, where he clearly sets out the downside risks and refers to questions about the “margin of spare capacity”. On the other side, he refers to possible “upside risks”, particularly in relation to inflation expectations. However, I suggest that noble Lords read the letters, rather than have me interpret them.