Lord Ashcombe Portrait

Lord Ashcombe

Conservative - Excepted Hereditary

Became Member: 28th October 2022


2 APPG Officer Positions (as of 9 Sep 2025)
Floating Offshore Wind, Insurance and Financial Services
2 APPG Memberships
Listed Properties, Energy Studies
Lord Ashcombe has no previous appointments


Division Voting information

During the current Parliament, Lord Ashcombe has voted in 113 divisions, and never against the majority of their Party.
View All Lord Ashcombe Division Votes

Debates during the 2024 Parliament

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Lord Barber of Ainsdale (Labour)
(3 debate interactions)
Lord Offord of Garvel (Conservative)
Shadow Minister (Energy Security and Net Zero)
(3 debate interactions)
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
(3 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Department for Business and Trade
(12 debate contributions)
Home Office
(9 debate contributions)
HM Treasury
(2 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
View all Lord Ashcombe's debates

Lords initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Lord Ashcombe, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.


Lord Ashcombe has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Lord Ashcombe has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 3 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
6th Oct 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of enabling companions permitted to accompany workers at disciplinary or grievance hearings to provide legal representation or act as legal advocates for workers during those hearings.

The current legal framework on the right to be accompanied has been in place for a long time. The framework aims to keep disciplinary and grievance procedures internal to the workplace. Expanding the types of organisations that could be involved in representing workers at discipline and grievance meetings could lead to these meetings requiring legal representation for both the worker and employer. This would invariably increase the cost of holding a hearing, add complexity and delays, and decrease the chance of amicable resolution as both parties become entrenched in a dispute.

Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
6th Oct 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of expanding the right to accompaniment at disciplinary or grievance hearings to persons other than trade union officials or other workers on minority groups and equality outcomes.

The current legal framework on the right to be accompanied has been in place for a long time. The framework aims to keep disciplinary and grievance procedures internal to the workplace. Expanding the types of organisations that could be involved in representing workers at discipline and grievance meetings could lead to these meetings requiring legal representation for both the worker and employer. This would invariably increase the cost of holding a hearing, add complexity and delays, and decrease the chance of amicable resolution as both parties become entrenched in a dispute.

Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
6th Oct 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have evidence that requiring employers to permit workers to be accompanied at disciplinary or grievance hearings by persons other than trade union officials or other workers is likely to increase the cost, complexity and length of such hearings.

The current legal framework on the right to be accompanied has been in place for a long time. The framework aims to keep disciplinary and grievance procedures internal to the workplace. Expanding the types of organisations that could be involved in representing workers at discipline and grievance meetings could lead to these meetings requiring legal representation for both the worker and employer. This would invariably increase the cost of holding a hearing, add complexity and delays, and decrease the chance of amicable resolution as both parties become entrenched in a dispute.

Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)