Lord Ashcombe Portrait

Lord Ashcombe

Conservative - Excepted Hereditary

Joined House of Lords: 28th October 2022


Lord Ashcombe is not an officer of any APPGs
2 APPG Memberships
Listed Properties, Energy Studies
2 Former APPG Officer Positions
Floating Offshore Wind, Insurance and Financial Services
Lord Ashcombe has no previous appointments


Division Voting information

During the current Parliament, Lord Ashcombe has voted in 241 divisions, and never against the majority of their Party.
View All Lord Ashcombe Division Votes

Debates during the 2024 Parliament

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Baroness Coffey (Conservative)
(5 debate interactions)
Lord Londesborough (Crossbench)
(5 debate interactions)
Lord Barber of Ainsdale (Labour)
(3 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Department for Business and Trade
(13 debate contributions)
Home Office
(11 debate contributions)
HM Treasury
(7 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
View all Lord Ashcombe's debates

Lords initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Lord Ashcombe, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.


Lord Ashcombe has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Lord Ashcombe has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 8 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
27th Mar 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Lord Collins of Highbury on 28 October 2025 (HL Deb col 1257), whether they have commenced the review of section 10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999; and if not, when they expect that review to begin.

The government has committed to review the functioning of section 10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 in its entirety. As part of this review, we will engage with relevant and interested stakeholders and publish our findings in Parliament. The review will start shortly and the government will write to interested parties in due course.

Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
6th Oct 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of enabling companions permitted to accompany workers at disciplinary or grievance hearings to provide legal representation or act as legal advocates for workers during those hearings.

The current legal framework on the right to be accompanied has been in place for a long time. The framework aims to keep disciplinary and grievance procedures internal to the workplace. Expanding the types of organisations that could be involved in representing workers at discipline and grievance meetings could lead to these meetings requiring legal representation for both the worker and employer. This would invariably increase the cost of holding a hearing, add complexity and delays, and decrease the chance of amicable resolution as both parties become entrenched in a dispute.

Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
6th Oct 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of expanding the right to accompaniment at disciplinary or grievance hearings to persons other than trade union officials or other workers on minority groups and equality outcomes.

The current legal framework on the right to be accompanied has been in place for a long time. The framework aims to keep disciplinary and grievance procedures internal to the workplace. Expanding the types of organisations that could be involved in representing workers at discipline and grievance meetings could lead to these meetings requiring legal representation for both the worker and employer. This would invariably increase the cost of holding a hearing, add complexity and delays, and decrease the chance of amicable resolution as both parties become entrenched in a dispute.

Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
6th Oct 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have evidence that requiring employers to permit workers to be accompanied at disciplinary or grievance hearings by persons other than trade union officials or other workers is likely to increase the cost, complexity and length of such hearings.

The current legal framework on the right to be accompanied has been in place for a long time. The framework aims to keep disciplinary and grievance procedures internal to the workplace. Expanding the types of organisations that could be involved in representing workers at discipline and grievance meetings could lead to these meetings requiring legal representation for both the worker and employer. This would invariably increase the cost of holding a hearing, add complexity and delays, and decrease the chance of amicable resolution as both parties become entrenched in a dispute.

Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
26th Mar 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of issuing no new oil and gas exploration licences on (1) supply chain capacity, and (2) retention of skilled offshore workers.

The government aims to ensure our oil and gas workers and supply chain can take advantage of our energy transition, creating a global blueprint for a transition that supports prosperity, jobs, economic growth, communities and energy security.

In the North Sea Future Plan, the government committed to develop support for supply chain businesses, investors, and workers to help them benefit from a pipeline of projects across the North Sea and in the UK’s energy future. We are also developing a world-class North Sea Jobs Service to provide end-to-end support for oil and gas workers to move into growing industries.

Lord Whitehead
Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)
26th Mar 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether domestic production has a lower lifecycle emissions intensity than imported liquefied natural gas.

The North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) published analysis in September 2025 comparing the emissions intensity of domestically produced gas with imported liquefied natural gas. This analysis is available on the NSTA’s website. In 2024, domestic gas production made up 43% of gross supply, LNG imports accounted for 14%, with the remainder coming from pipeline imports – principally from Norway.

Lord Whitehead
Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)
26th Mar 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have modelled the emissions implications of replacing domestic production with imported liquefied natural gas.

The North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) published analysis in September 2025 comparing the emissions intensity of domestically produced gas with imported liquefied natural gas. This analysis is available on the NSTA’s website. In 2024, domestic gas production made up 43% of gross supply, LNG imports accounted for 14%, with the remainder coming from pipeline imports – principally from Norway.

Lord Whitehead
Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)
26th Mar 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact on UK energy import dependency of issuing no new oil and gas exploration licences.

We became a net importer of energy in 2004. Given the maturity of the basin, and the high proportion of future production projected to come from existing developments versus new developments and discoveries, further licensing in the North Sea would not reverse the basin’s natural decline.

Lord Whitehead
Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)