International Development Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for International Development

Liz Twist

Main Page: Liz Twist (Labour - Blaydon and Consett)

Department Debates - View all Liz Twist's debates with the Department for International Development


Education

International Development

Liz Twist Excerpts

Future Day:
Wed 12th Jun 2019
Ministerial Correction
Monday 10th June 2019

(5 years, 10 months ago)

Ministerial Corrections
Share Debate
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
The following is an extract from International Development questions on 6 June 2019.
Liz Twist Portrait Liz Twist (Blaydon) (Lab)
- Hansard -
-

T3. For the past 25 years, the UK has rightly been committed to ensuring that aid spending is untied from commercial interests. How does the Secretary of State explain the ONE Campaign’s research that found that almost £475 million of UK aid was still effectively tied?

Rory Stewart Portrait Rory Stewart
- Hansard -
- - Excerpts

We are very clear that we do not tie aid spending. There may be situations in which it is beneficial. For example, we have just put £70 million into British universities to find a universal cure for snake bites. That is a very good example of how we can solve a global public health problem through investment in British universities, but that is not tied aid; it is because British research and development, particularly the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, is the leader in this area.

[Official Report, 6 June 2019, Vol. 661, c. 268.]

Letter of correction from the Secretary of State for International Development:

Errors have been identified in the response I gave to the hon. Member for Blaydon (Liz Twist).

The correct response should have been:

Return to start of debate - Return to top of page