Information between 24th March 2025 - 3rd May 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 306 |
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 305 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 170 |
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 302 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 167 |
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 62 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 167 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 104 |
31 Mar 2025 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 164 |
1 Apr 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 110 Noes - 302 |
1 Apr 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 303 Noes - 110 |
2 Apr 2025 - Energy Conservation - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 349 Noes - 14 |
23 Apr 2025 - Sewage - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 69 |
23 Apr 2025 - Hospitals - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 307 |
23 Apr 2025 - Sewage - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 302 |
29 Apr 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 232 Labour No votes vs 11 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 238 |
29 Apr 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 248 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 257 |
29 Apr 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 248 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 101 Noes - 258 |
29 Apr 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Liz Kendall voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 248 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 73 Noes - 255 |
Speeches |
---|
Liz Kendall speeches from: Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill
Liz Kendall contributed 1 speech (725 words) Report stageReport Stage Tuesday 29th April 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
Liz Kendall speeches from: Households Below Average Income: Statistics Release
Liz Kendall contributed 1 speech (814 words) Thursday 27th March 2025 - Written Statements Department for Work and Pensions |
Parliamentary Research |
---|
Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill 2024-25: Progress of the bill - CBP-10246
Apr. 16 2025 Found: The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Liz Kendall, said the bill would “help deliver the biggest |
Petitions |
---|
Stop the changes to pip, UC and all benefits reductions Petition Rejected - 6 SignaturesThis government was elected as a labour government but has completely betrayed it's voters with these benefit cuts. This petition was rejected on 14th Apr 2025 for not being a Government or Parliamentary matterFound: Liz Kendall and reeves to resign |
Stop the cuts to the Welfare System. Petition Rejected - 7 SignaturesScrap the planned Welfare System cuts introduced on March 18th by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall. This petition was rejected on 16th Apr 2025 as it duplicates an existing petitionFound: Scrap the planned Welfare System cuts introduced on March 18th by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall |
Reverse Cuts to Unfit For Work Benefits & PIP Claims for Disabled People Petition Rejected - 14 SignaturesWith recent plans to freeze Personal Independent Payment in 2026 & heavily cutting this & Unfit For Work Universal Credit benefits for disabled people, this will not help ‘encourage disabled people back into work’, it'll instead worsening their quality of life due to them not being able to get work. This petition was rejected on 14th Apr 2025 as it duplicates an existing petitionFound: Liz Kendall, the Work & Pensions secretary for the current Government, has made baseless statements of |
Department Publications - Transparency |
---|
Thursday 24th April 2025
Cabinet Office Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: March 2025 Document: (webpage) Found: Given or Received Who gift was given to or received from Value (£) Outcome (Received gifts only) Liz Kendall |
Thursday 24th April 2025
Cabinet Office Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: March 2025 Document: (webpage) Found: offered hospitality Type of Hospitality Received Accompanied by Guest Value of Hospitality (£) Liz Kendall |
Scottish Parliamentary Debates |
---|
United Kingdom Government Welfare Reforms
56 speeches (120,262 words) Wednesday 23rd April 2025 - Main Chamber Mentions: 1: Smith, Liz (Con - Mid Scotland and Fife) I agree with Liz Kendall that there are very serious issues in welfare. - Link to Speech 2: Stevenson, Collette (SNP - East Kilbride) Keir Starmer, Liz Kendall and Anas Sarwar should listen to disabled people’s organisations and poverty - Link to Speech |
Spring Statement 2025 (Impact on Scotland)
91 speeches (100,350 words) Wednesday 2nd April 2025 - Main Chamber Mentions: 1: Stewart, Kevin (SNP - Aberdeen Central) However, rather than reforming PIP for the better, Liz Kendall chose simply to restrict PIP to people - Link to Speech 2: Gibson, Kenneth (SNP - Cunninghame North) Prior to the announcement, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Liz Kendall, was apparently - Link to Speech |
Welsh Government Publications |
---|
Tuesday 22nd April 2025
Source Page: FOI release 24611: Welfare reform Document: Welfare reform (PDF) Found: Copies of any written correspondence between the First Minister and Liz Kendall, Secretary of State |
Wednesday 9th April 2025
Source Page: FOI release 24560: Welfare Reforms Document: Doc 1 (PDF) Found: Eich cyf/Your ref Ein cyf/Our ref Rt Hon Liz Kendall MP, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions |
Thursday 3rd April 2025
Source Page: FOI release 24506: Winter fuel payment Document: Doc 2 (PDF) Found: THE RT HON LIZ KENDALL MP |
Welsh Senedd Debates |
---|
5. Urgent Debate: The impact of the Chancellor's recent welfare reforms
None speech (None words) Wednesday 2nd April 2025 - None |
1. Questions to the First Minister
None speech (None words) Tuesday 1st April 2025 - None |
Welsh Senedd Speeches |
---|
Wed 02 Apr 2025
No Department None 5. Urgent Debate: The impact of the Chancellor's recent welfare reforms <p>That's absolutely the case and I've heard learning disabled and autistic people say that, and we've seen that through Engage to Change. I listened very carefully to your 90-second statement, which made that clear, in Autism Awareness Month, as well.</p> |
Wed 02 Apr 2025
No Department None 5. Urgent Debate: The impact of the Chancellor's recent welfare reforms <p>I thank Sioned for pushing for this debate today; however, I am of the opinion that whatever is said here today will have little to no impact on UK Government policy. This is not a UK Government known for listening to the Labour cliques in the Welsh Government. Why should they pay any attention to what we say here today?</p> |
Tue 01 Apr 2025
No Department None 1. Questions to the First Minister <p>Thanks very much. Listen, I've been one of the people who have been up to my neck in the COVID inquiry, and I can tell you there's nothing more transparent than the system we've just been through. We've spent millions of pounds, taken hours of lawyers' time, making sure that we give answers to those people who suffered during the pandemic. So, I don't think that there's a lack of transparency in relation to COVID. And as I've just mentioned, I have no problem at all in Liz Kendall publishing that letter, and I hope she'll do so this afternoon. </p> |
Tue 01 Apr 2025
No Department None 1. Questions to the First Minister <p>Look, I'm really pleased the UK Government has committed to invest an additional £1 billion a year to build towards a guarantee of personalised support when it comes to employment. I think that's really constructive. That's standing by people, that's following the kind of approach that we have in relation to youth unemployment. Now, the UK Government is going to be supporting the Welsh Government as we lead the design of a 'get Britain working' trailblazer, and that's going to be backed by £10 million of funding to explore how work, health and skills—how that skills support will be delivered by the Welsh and UK Governments, how we join that up to help people to move towards and into work. In the longer term, the UK Government has also committed to devolving non-Jobcentre Plus employment support funding to the Welsh Government, and the Secretary of State has offered to work with us on the impact of the welfare proposals on Wales. And whilst, of course, we'll work with them, this is a UK Government proposal, and they must take ownership of it, but I will take up the offer to meet Liz Kendall to work through this.</p> |
Tue 01 Apr 2025
No Department None 1. Questions to the First Minister <p>Diolch, Llywydd. My breath has been taken away. You said you’re going to speak up for disabled people in your answer to Cefin Campell, you said you’re going to listen to them. It doesn’t sound like you’re listening. As has already been highlighted to you, these cuts have been roundly criticised, condemned even by policy experts, by support organisations, and, most importantly, by disabled people themselves.</p> |