Draft Procurement (Amendment) Regulations 2026 Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Draft Procurement (Amendment) Regulations 2026

Lisa Smart Excerpts
Wednesday 11th March 2026

(1 day, 8 hours ago)

General Committees
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lisa Smart Portrait Lisa Smart (Hazel Grove) (LD)
- Hansard - -

It is a pleasure to see you in the Chair, Mr Twigg. Steps to improve transparency around public procurement are, of course, welcome. The granting of the federated data platform contract to Palantir and the scandalous covid personal protective equipment contract under the previous Conservative Government have undermined confidence in public procurement in recent years. Members of the public, doctors and even whole NHS trusts are questioning the fairness of some NHS contracts, so steps to improve the transparency of the contracts, along with public procurement more broadly, must be welcomed.

We also welcome steps to modernise public procurement systems and to phase out legacy systems such as Contracts Finder in favour of a modern, unified platform. My reading of the regulations is that a Minister has to consent or be notified before an NHS body cancels a contract on national security grounds. Will the Minister set out what this specific change is trying to deliver and why now is the right time? Is it the Government’s understanding that there are any current contracts that are a national security concern? If so, will the Minister share with us which contracts? Or is this a change that stops trusts cancelling a given contract on the grounds of security?