Information between 30th August 2026 - 9th September 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Linsey Farnsworth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 322 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 411 Noes - 102 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Linsey Farnsworth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 427 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Linsey Farnsworth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Linsey Farnsworth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 346 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Linsey Farnsworth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 316 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Linsey Farnsworth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 317 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Linsey Farnsworth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 289 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 297 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Linsey Farnsworth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 302 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Linsey Farnsworth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 292 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 357 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Linsey Farnsworth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 79 Noes - 300 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Linsey Farnsworth speeches from: Local Government Reorganisation
Linsey Farnsworth contributed 1 speech (85 words) Monday 7th September 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Linsey Farnsworth speeches from: Direction of Government
Linsey Farnsworth contributed 1 speech (95 words) Tuesday 1st September 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Pupils: Sick Leave
Asked by: Linsey Farnsworth (Labour - Amber Valley) Tuesday 1st September 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what is the total number of school days lost by pupils due to the incidence of infectious disease in (a) primary (b) secondary schools in England in the school years 2024/25 and 2025/26 and what proportion of all pupil school days this represents. Answered by Paul Waugh - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The department does not collect data on absence due specifically to infectious disease. The closest available measure is absence due to illness. In 2024/25, illness accounted for 2.83% of all possible sessions in state-funded primary schools and 3.61% in state-funded secondary schools. These figures are based on school census data, available at: https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/data-tables/permalink/71a4148c-f739-4adc-9a80-08dee27f7d76. For 2025/26 to date, illness absence has accounted for 2.81% of possible sessions in primary schools and 3.63% in secondary schools. Data for 2025/26 is based on daily attendance data and may be subject to change as registers update. Details are available at: https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/data-tables/permalink/cfdaf89b-050d-4c76-179f-08dee28a6f1d.
|
|
Health and Safety
Asked by: Linsey Farnsworth (Labour - Amber Valley) Tuesday 1st September 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment the Health and Safety Executive has made of the need for formal guidance for employers and workplace operators on workplace cleanliness and hygiene standards to help prevent the spread of infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government) (Equalities) Employers have duties under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 to assess and control risks to workers and others arising from their activities. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) already provides guidance on infections and biological hazards at work, including risk assessment, infection control measures, and preventing exposure to biological agents.
HSE's guidance makes it clear that employers should identify biological hazards, assess who may be harmed and implement proportionate control measures. These may include the use of disinfectants, appropriate hygiene arrangements and surfaces that can be easily cleaned where necessary to reduce the likelihood and spread of infection. Where no specific biological hazards are identified, employers should nevertheless ensure suitable workplace hygiene arrangements are in place.
For settings with specific infection prevention requirements, such as health and adult social care, additional sector-specific guidance is available from the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England.
HSE keeps its guidance under review and has not identified a need for additional formal guidance specifically on workplace cleanliness and hygiene standards to prevent the spread of infectious diseases or antimicrobial resistance. |
|
Hygiene
Asked by: Linsey Farnsworth (Labour - Amber Valley) Thursday 3rd September 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential implications for his policies of the World Health Organization and UNICEF's 2025 Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Community Settings; and whether he plans to take steps to promote their implementation in public places and workplaces. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department and the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) recognise that effective infection prevention and control measures play an important role in reducing the transmission of infectious diseases in workplaces, public spaces, and other community settings. Current evidence continues to support targeted, risk-based hygiene measures as an effective means of reducing the spread of infectious diseases. The World Health Organization and UNICEF's guidelines highlight the role of hand hygiene in community environments, including public and institutional settings, and in reducing diarrhoeal disease and acute respiratory infections. These objectives are consistent with existing Government policies to prevent and control infections and support public health. |
|
Hygiene
Asked by: Linsey Farnsworth (Labour - Amber Valley) Thursday 3rd September 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his Department and the UK Health Security Agency have made of the potential merits of promoting targeted hygiene in workplaces and public spaces as a means of reducing the spread of infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department and the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) recognise that effective infection prevention and control measures play an important role in reducing the transmission of infectious diseases in workplaces, public spaces, and other community settings. Current evidence continues to support targeted, risk-based hygiene measures as an effective means of reducing the spread of infectious diseases. The World Health Organization and UNICEF's guidelines highlight the role of hand hygiene in community environments, including public and institutional settings, and in reducing diarrhoeal disease and acute respiratory infections. These objectives are consistent with existing Government policies to prevent and control infections and support public health. |
|
Teachers: Sick Leave
Asked by: Linsey Farnsworth (Labour - Amber Valley) Friday 4th September 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what is the total number of school days lost by teaching staff due to the incidence of infectious disease in (a) primary (b) secondary schools in England in the school years 2024/25 and 2025/26 and the proportion of all teacher school days this represents. Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education) The information requested is not held centrally. The department collects absence data for teachers and teaching assistants employed directly by state-funded schools via the school workforce census. This includes absences due to sickness but does not include the reason for the sickness absence. Each census collects data for absences from the previous academic year. The latest data available covers the 2024/25 academic year and is published in the ‘School workforce in England’ statistical publication, which is available here: https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/school-workforce-in-england. |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 4th September 2026
Formal Minutes - Formal Minutes 2026 - 27 (to 15 July 26) Committee of Selection Found: Resolved, Linsey Farnsworth to be discharged from the Justice Committee and Janet Daby to be nominated |