Debates between Lindsay Hoyle and George Eustice during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Thu 13th Mar 2014

Badger Cull

Debate between Lindsay Hoyle and George Eustice
Thursday 13th March 2014

(10 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker (Mr Lindsay Hoyle)
- Hansard - -

You know very well, as I do, that if a Member shouts one way, they should not vote the other way, but they could abstain.

George Eustice Portrait George Eustice
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I want to say a little about what we have done to progress an oral vaccine. We are spending £1.6 million a year—

--- Later in debate ---
Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker (Mr Lindsay Hoyle)
- Hansard - -

That is not a matter for me, as the hon. Gentleman is well aware, but I am sure that his point will have been heard. [Interruption.] If the Minister wishes to respond, I am happy for him to do so.

George Eustice Portrait George Eustice
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will respond, Mr Deputy Speaker, because obviously the shadow Minister has an issue with the fact that we have received the report. We have indeed received it, and we are considering it. It was not our decision when the report was delivered to us; an independent expert panel decided that. It was not our decision to have this debate, nor did we get involved in the decision of the Backbench Business Committee to have the debate today, and nor is it the role of Labour Members to dictate when the Government should publish the report. Let me be very clear: we have always been clear that we will publish the report and then, when we have made a decision—we have not made any decisions yet—[Interruption.] No, I am not going to confirm that there will be a vote. I have discussed and debated this many times, and I am sure we will have many opportunities to do so again in the future.

Baroness McIntosh of Pickering Portrait Miss McIntosh
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Further to that point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. We have had a very well-mannered, even-handed and good-tempered debate, and I regret that we have had what the record may prove to be a vote on very erroneous grounds indeed. I would like to refer to this point of order when we have the record of the vote.