Debates between Lindsay Hoyle and David Winnick during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Business without Debate

Debate between Lindsay Hoyle and David Winnick
Wednesday 9th September 2015

(9 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker (Mr Lindsay Hoyle)
- Hansard - -

Mr Winnick, you have missed the motion, which is without debate.

David Winnick Portrait Mr Winnick
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On motion 3.

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - -

You have missed it. I have gone well beyond that. We are actually on the presentation of petitions.

Petition

Debate between Lindsay Hoyle and David Winnick
Wednesday 9th September 2015

(9 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
David Winnick Portrait Mr Winnick
- Hansard - - Excerpts

On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. I wonder if I could clarify the situation over motion 3 on the Order Paper. I would be grateful for your advice. I was sitting here and waiting for the opportunity to speak. Clearly, the matter went on without my being able to catch your eye. I wanted to object to the method of appointment, to point out the need for elections to that Committee and to put the case accordingly. In those circumstances, I wonder if you can advise me on how I can pursue this, since I was not able to make my remarks today.

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker (Mr Lindsay Hoyle)
- Hansard -

First of all, it was not that you did not catch my eye. You caught my eye after we had voted on it and we were on to the next part. I was at the petition when you decided to stand. It is not about catching my eye. You were not on your feet and unfortunately, as one of the most senior Members of the House, you know the rules quite clearly. The bottom line is there is nothing we can do now. It has gone through and I suggest that you take up through other channels the way you feel the Committee should be appointed. As we know, that is not prescribed in the House rules and the rules would have to be changed accordingly.

Refugee Crisis

Debate between Lindsay Hoyle and David Winnick
Wednesday 9th September 2015

(9 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
David Winnick Portrait Mr Winnick
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. I wonder if I could clarify the situation over motion 3 on the Order Paper. I would be grateful for your advice. I was sitting here and waiting for the opportunity to speak. Clearly, the matter went on without my being able to catch your eye. I wanted to object to the method of appointment, to point out the need for elections to that Committee and to put the case accordingly. In those circumstances, I wonder if you can advise me on how I can pursue this, since I was not able to make my remarks today.

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker (Mr Lindsay Hoyle)
- Hansard - -

First of all, it was not that you did not catch my eye. You caught my eye after we had voted on it and we were on to the next part. I was at the petition when you decided to stand. It is not about catching my eye. You were not on your feet and unfortunately, as one of the most senior Members of the House, you know the rules quite clearly. The bottom line is there is nothing we can do now. It has gone through and I suggest that you take up through other channels the way you feel the Committee should be appointed. As we know, that is not prescribed in the House rules and the rules would have to be changed accordingly.