To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Road Traffic Control: Police
Friday 21st January 2022

Asked by: Lilian Greenwood (Labour - Nottingham South)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps he has taken to implement the recommendations of HMICFRS's July 2020 report, Roads Policing: Not optional - An inspection of roads policing in England and Wales.

Answered by Trudy Harrison

The HMICFRS report Roads Policing: Not Optional was commissioned by the Roads Policing Review Governance Board which is jointly chaired by officials from the Department for Transport and the Home Office. Recommendations 1 to 3 and 7 were addressed to the Government. The remainder of the thirteen recommendations were for Chief Constables and the College of Policing.

In respect of Recommendation 1 that Department for Transport and Home Office produce a joint road safety strategy, the Government is going further. We will instead establish a cross Government Road Safety Strategic Board to engage all Departments in a strategic framework to reduce road casualties.

The use of statutory powers to require locally elected PCCs to include specific policing issues in their Police and Crime plans needs to be balanced with a proper regard for local autonomy and the will of local voters. PCCs are directly elected and must consult their communities in developing a Police and Crime Plan that reflects local circumstances. The Home Office is committed to working closely with the police and PCCs to consider what further improvements can be made to the effectiveness of roads enforcement in England and Wales and reduce road traffic casualties.

The Strategic Policing Requirement (SPR) will set clear direction to policing on the contribution they need to make to respond to national threats including terrorism, serious and organised crime and child sexual abuse. It will highlight where police forces need to work together, using local and/or regional capabilities, to protect the public. Following the SPR review that we concluded last year, we are considering the national threats and policing capabilities, such as roads policing, that are included in the SPR. The revised SPR will be published in due course.

Recommendation 7 was that the Government should refresh Department for Transport Circular 1/2007. The Department for Transport is currently redrafting and updating the guidance in consultation with stakeholders and it is anticipated new guidance will be published in the summer.

The Home Office and Department for Transport will continue to work with the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, the National Police Chiefs’ Council and the College of Policing to monitor the progress made in respect of the recommendations relevant to them. This will be done in a manner that respects the operational independence of Chief Officers and the College of Policing.


Written Question
Roads: Safety
Thursday 20th January 2022

Asked by: Lilian Greenwood (Labour - Nottingham South)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, when he plans to publish the report on road safety targets which was commissioned by his Department in conjunction with WSP and Loughborough University.

Answered by Trudy Harrison

The report will be published in full in due course.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 16 Dec 2021
Oral Answers to Questions

"Roads across this country are blocked every single day not by protesters, but by traffic congestion, at a huge cost to health, the environment and business. This problem will only get worse unless the alternatives to rising car use—walking, cycling and public transport—are safer, more convenient and affordable. Will the …..."
Lilian Greenwood - View Speech

View all Lilian Greenwood (Lab - Nottingham South) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 08 Dec 2021
Rail Investment and Integrated Rail Plan

"My hon. Friend is making a very powerful argument. Does she agree that it is not surprising that the Government are reneging on their promises on the HS2 eastern leg because they did precisely the same thing with regard to electrification of the midland mainline, which was promised by 2015, …..."
Lilian Greenwood - View Speech

View all Lilian Greenwood (Lab - Nottingham South) contributions to the debate on: Rail Investment and Integrated Rail Plan

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 08 Dec 2021
Rail Investment and Integrated Rail Plan

"Will the Secretary of State confirm that under his plans, the high speed line joins the midland main line at East Midlands Parkway and does not go any further north, thus depriving Nottingham and all the cities of the east midlands of the improved connectivity and faster journey times to …..."
Lilian Greenwood - View Speech

View all Lilian Greenwood (Lab - Nottingham South) contributions to the debate on: Rail Investment and Integrated Rail Plan

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 08 Dec 2021
Rail Investment and Integrated Rail Plan

"Will the hon. Gentleman give way?..."
Lilian Greenwood - View Speech

View all Lilian Greenwood (Lab - Nottingham South) contributions to the debate on: Rail Investment and Integrated Rail Plan

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 08 Dec 2021
Rail Investment and Integrated Rail Plan

"Does the hon. Gentleman not think that this decision to reverse the previous decision to cancel the electrification of the midland main line shows that the Government do not have a proper strategy for delivering net zero or for delivering rail investment? Is this not the most inefficient way to …..."
Lilian Greenwood - View Speech

View all Lilian Greenwood (Lab - Nottingham South) contributions to the debate on: Rail Investment and Integrated Rail Plan

Speech in Westminster Hall - Mon 13 Sep 2021
HS2

"Does my hon. Friend also agree that this is about freight? We can only expect freight movements to increase, and we want them to get off the roads and on to the railway. That will be possible only if we create the extra capacity that HS2 will give us...."
Lilian Greenwood - View Speech

View all Lilian Greenwood (Lab - Nottingham South) contributions to the debate on: HS2

Written Question
Travel: Finance
Tuesday 13th July 2021

Asked by: Lilian Greenwood (Labour - Nottingham South)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many and which highway authorities were notified that they could not bid for active travel capital funding for 2021-22 from Tranche 3 of the Active Travel Fund.

Answered by Chris Heaton-Harris

The Department made it clear to authorities that their performance with earlier tranches of active travel funding would be taken into account in allocating future funds. One council was not invited to bid this year and, for similar reasons, a number of other authorities will receive a reduction in their allocation, or if their bids are not of high enough quality, potentially no funding at all.


Written Question
Roads: Repairs and Maintenance
Monday 12th July 2021

Asked by: Lilian Greenwood (Labour - Nottingham South)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what proportion of steel used by Highways England in the construction and repair of the strategic road network is manufactured in the UK.

Answered by Baroness Maclean of Redditch

Highways England cannot currently determine what proportion of steel used in the construction and repair of the Strategic Road Network (SRN) is manufactured in the UK. Steel is purchased within the supply chain and not by Highways England directly.

Highways England is working with its suppliers to obtain deeper visibility of raw material sourcing and manage its supply pipeline effectively.