Leigh Ingham - Alert Sample

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Leigh Ingham

Information between 17th February 2026 - 9th March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Division Votes
23 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Leigh Ingham voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 73 Noes - 286
23 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Leigh Ingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 361 Noes - 84
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context Leigh Ingham voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 280
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context Leigh Ingham voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 271 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 156 Noes - 273
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context Leigh Ingham voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 270 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 272
24 Feb 2026 - Online Harm: Child Protection - View Vote Context Leigh Ingham voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 272 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 279
2 Mar 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Leigh Ingham voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 327 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410

Speeches
Leigh Ingham speeches from: Community Cohesion Leigh Ingham contributed 2 speeches (1,354 words) Tuesday 3rd March 2026 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Leigh Ingham speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions Leigh Ingham contributed 1 speech (73 words) Monday 2nd March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Education
Leigh Ingham speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions Leigh Ingham contributed 2 speeches (76 words) Thursday 26th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
Leigh Ingham speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions Leigh Ingham contributed 1 speech (68 words) Monday 23rd February 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Leigh Ingham speeches from: Schools White Paper: Every Child Achieving and Thriving Leigh Ingham contributed 1 speech (86 words) Monday 23rd February 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for International Development
Leigh Ingham speeches from: Firearms Licensing Leigh Ingham contributed 2 speeches (113 words) Monday 23rd February 2026 - Westminster Hall Home Office

Leigh Ingham mentioned

Live Transcript
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.
2 Mar 2026, 3:30 p.m. - House of Commons " Luton North Leigh Ingham. >> Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Given that this week is UK Colleges Week, can I take this opportunity to highlight Stafford College, widely " Georgia Gould MP, Minister of State (Education) (Queen's Park and Maida Vale, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript

Calendar
Tuesday 24th March 2026 11:30 a.m. Department for Energy Security & Net Zero Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Energy Security and Net Zero (including Topical Questions) Roz Savage: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Iqbal Mohamed: Whether he has had discussions with the Chancellor of the Exchequer on global taxes on oil and gas companies in the context of the proposed UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation. Josh Fenton-Glynn: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Danny Beales: What steps he is taking to increase grid capacity in west London. Michael Wheeler: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Sonia Kumar: What steps he is taking to help prevent increases in energy bills for households. Stuart Anderson: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Liz Jarvis: What steps he is taking to help reduce household energy bills. Jo White: What steps he is taking to attract private sector investment for a fusion reactor. Stephen Gethins: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Stephen Gethins: What steps his Department is taking to support communities in Scotland with the cost of energy bills. Helen Morgan: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Callum Anderson: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Sarah Hall: What assessment he has made of the potential impact of trends in the level of methane harvested from landfill sites on energy security. John Cooper: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Helen Morgan: What assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the process for implementing Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects in relation to electric lines. Chris Murray: What assessment he has made of the potential impact of the Middle East conflict on energy security. Mark Sewards: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Kevin McKenna: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Sarah Gibson: What recent progress he has made on improving connections to the electricity grid. Mary Glindon: What discussions he has had with private sector representatives on securing investment in clean energy industries. Angus MacDonald: What steps he is taking to support rural homes that use heating oil. Blake Stephenson: What assessment he has made of the potential impact of the conflict in Iran on energy prices. James Wild: What steps his Department is taking to help reduce household energy bills. Peter Lamb: What assessment he has made of the potential impact of the Warm Homes Plan on levels of fuel poverty in Crawley constituency. Martin Rhodes: What steps his Department is taking to help terminally ill people with increased energy costs. Chris Coghlan: What assessment he has made of the potential impact of trends in the level of funding for energy security research and development on the economy. Charlie Dewhirst: What steps his Department is taking to help reduce household energy bills. Leigh Ingham: What steps he is taking with Cabinet colleagues to ensure that solar energy development protects rural land. Mohammad Yasin: What steps he is taking to help reduce levels of dependence on international fossil fuel markets. Wendy Morton: What steps his Department is taking to help reduce household energy bills. Tristan Osborne: What steps he is taking to increase the production of domestic clean power in supporting energy security. Daniel Zeichner: What steps he is taking to help reduce levels of dependence on international fossil fuel markets. Peter Fortune: What steps his Department is taking to help reduce household energy bills. Helen Maguire: What steps he is taking to help consumers with the cost of energy bills. View calendar - Add to calendar

Calendar

Tuesday 24th March 2026 11:30 a.m.
Department for Energy Security & Net Zero

Oral questions - Main Chamber
Subject: Energy Security and Net Zero (including Topical Questions)
Roz Savage: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.
Iqbal Mohamed: Whether he has had discussions with the Chancellor of the Exchequer on global taxes on oil and gas companies in the context of the proposed UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation.
Josh Fenton-Glynn: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.
Danny Beales: What steps he is taking to increase grid capacity in west London.
Michael Wheeler: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.
Sonia Kumar: What steps he is taking to help prevent increases in energy bills for households.
Stuart Anderson: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.
Liz Jarvis: What steps he is taking to help reduce household energy bills.
Jo White: What steps he is taking to attract private sector investment for a fusion reactor.
Stephen Gethins: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.
Stephen Gethins: What steps his Department is taking to support communities in Scotland with the cost of energy bills.
Helen Morgan: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.
Callum Anderson: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.
Sarah Hall: What assessment he has made of the potential impact of trends in the level of methane harvested from landfill sites on energy security.
John Cooper: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.
Helen Morgan: What assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the process for implementing Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects in relation to electric lines.
Chris Murray: What assessment he has made of the potential impact of the Middle East conflict on energy security.
Mark Sewards: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.
Kevin McKenna: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.
Sarah Gibson: What recent progress he has made on improving connections to the electricity grid.
Mary Glindon: What discussions he has had with private sector representatives on securing investment in clean energy industries.
Angus MacDonald: What steps he is taking to support rural homes that use heating oil.
Blake Stephenson: What assessment he has made of the potential impact of the conflict in Iran on energy prices.
James Wild: What steps his Department is taking to help reduce household energy bills.
Peter Lamb: What assessment he has made of the potential impact of the Warm Homes Plan on levels of fuel poverty in Crawley constituency.
Martin Rhodes: What steps his Department is taking to help terminally ill people with increased energy costs.
Chris Coghlan: What assessment he has made of the potential impact of trends in the level of funding for energy security research and development on the economy.
Charlie Dewhirst: What steps his Department is taking to help reduce household energy bills.
Leigh Ingham: What steps he is taking with Cabinet colleagues to ensure that solar energy development protects rural land.
Mohammad Yasin: What steps he is taking to help reduce levels of dependence on international fossil fuel markets.
Wendy Morton: What steps his Department is taking to help reduce household energy bills.
Tristan Osborne: What steps he is taking to increase the production of domestic clean power in supporting energy security.
Daniel Zeichner: What steps he is taking to help reduce levels of dependence on international fossil fuel markets.
Peter Fortune: What steps his Department is taking to help reduce household energy bills.
Helen Maguire: What steps he is taking to help consumers with the cost of energy bills.
View calendar - Add to calendar

Parliamentary Debates
Community Cohesion 41 speeches (13,457 words) Tuesday 3rd March 2026 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Miatta Fahnbulleh (LAB - Peckham) Friend the Member for Stafford (Leigh Ingham) is absolutely right; at the heart of this is a story about - Link to Speech
Online Harm: Child Protection 198 speeches (33,980 words) Tuesday 24th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Science, Innovation & Technology Mentions: 1: Gareth Snell (LAB - Stoke-on-Trent Central) Friend the Member for Stafford (Leigh Ingham) and I will be doing events across our two constituencies - Link to Speech

Select Committee Documents
Thursday 5th March 2026 Formal Minutes - Formal Minutes of the Speaker's Conference on the security of candidates, MPs and elections in Session 2024−26 Speaker's Conference (2024) Committee Found: Mr Clive Betts MP Kirsty Blackman MP Samantha Dixon MP Zöe Franklin MP Dr Rupa Huq MP Leigh Ingham
Thursday 5th March 2026 Attendance statistics - Members' attendance 2024–26 (Northern Ireland Affairs Committee) Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Found: Aldridge (Labour, Weston-super-Mare) (added 28 Oct 2024; removed 8 Dec 2025) 17 of 33 (51.5%) Leigh Ingham
Thursday 5th March 2026 Special Report - 1st Special Report: Speaker’s Conference on the security of MPs, candidates and elections: Government Response Speaker's Conference (2024) Committee Found: Neston) Zöe Franklin (Liberal Democrat; Guildford) Dr Rupa Huq (Labour; Ealing Central and Acton) Leigh Ingham
Thursday 5th March 2026 Special Report - 1st Special Report: Speaker’s Conference on the security of MPs, candidates and elections: Government Response Speaker's Conference (2024) Committee Found: Neston) Zöe Franklin (Liberal Democrat; Guildford) Dr Rupa Huq (Labour; Ealing Central and Acton) Leigh Ingham

Leigh Ingham - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Tuesday 10th March 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 5th May 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 21st April 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar

Select Committee Documents
Thursday 5th March 2026 Correspondence - Letter, dated 10 November 2025, from Unite the Union, relating to the Committee's Second Report on the security of MPs, candidates and elections Speaker's Conference (2024) Committee
Thursday 5th March 2026 Correspondence - Letter, dated 1 December 2025, from the Welsh Government relating to the Committee's Second Report on the security of MPs, candidates and elections Speaker's Conference (2024) Committee
Thursday 5th March 2026 Correspondence - Letter, dated 4 February 2026, from Mr Speaker to the Right Honourable Lady Justice Juliet May, Chair, The Sentencing Council for England and Wales relating to the Sentencing Council's response to the Committee's Second Report on the security of MPs, candidates and elections Speaker's Conference (2024) Committee
Thursday 5th March 2026 Special Report - 1st Special Report: Speaker’s Conference on the security of MPs, candidates and elections: Government Response Speaker's Conference (2024) Committee
Thursday 5th March 2026 Special Report - 1st Special Report: Speaker’s Conference on the security of MPs, candidates and elections: Government Response Speaker's Conference (2024) Committee
Thursday 5th March 2026 Formal Minutes - Formal Minutes of the Speaker's Conference on the security of candidates, MPs and elections in Session 2024−26 Speaker's Conference (2024) Committee
Thursday 5th March 2026 Special Report - Large Print - 1st Special Report: Speaker’s Conference on the security of MPs, candidates and elections: Government Response Speaker's Conference (2024) Committee
Thursday 5th March 2026 Special Report - Large Print - 1st Special Report: Speaker’s Conference on the security of MPs, candidates and elections: Government Response Speaker's Conference (2024) Committee
Thursday 19th March 2026 Special Report - 1st Special Report – Access to the House of Commons and its procedures: House Administration Response Modernisation Committee
Thursday 19th March 2026 Special Report - Easy Read – 1st Special Report – Access to the House of Commons and its procedures: House Administration Response Modernisation Committee
Thursday 19th March 2026 Special Report - Large Print – 1st Special Report – Access to the House of Commons and its procedures: House Administration Response Modernisation Committee
Thursday 19th March 2026 Special Report - Easy Read Annex A – 1st Special Report – Access to the House of Commons and its procedures: House Administration Response Modernisation Committee

Select Committee Inquiry
16 Mar 2026 Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee Debates Modernisation Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The cross-party Modernisation Committee is holding an inquiry into Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee debates, as part of its ongoing work on how time is used in the Commons. Backbench Business Committee debates offer MPs a vital route to raise issues on behalf of their constituents, and since its establishment the Committee has ensured that backbench voices are heard regularly. The Petitions Committee has facilitated many debates on e-petitions started by members of the public, ensuring that issues with significant public support are brought before the House. Many of these debates have helped raise the profile of important issues and, in some cases, led to tangible action being taken. The Modernisation Committee’s inquiry will look at whether the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates is appropriate and effective. It will also explore other issues such as whether some e-petitions debates should take place in the Chamber on a more regular basis. MPs on the Committee will also explore the issues highlighted in the Backbench Business Committee’s 15 anniversary report, and how the House can continue to support and strengthen the Committee’s work. Terms of Reference The Backbench Business Committee has 35 days allotted in each session for proceedings in the Chamber/Westminster Hall on backbench business, of which at least 27 should be in the Chamber. More information can be found on their website. The Petitions Committee can schedule a petition or petitions for debate in Westminster Hall on a Monday from 4.30pm, for up to three hours. More information is available here. We will be exploring the following questions as part of our inquiry: 1. Is the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates appropriate and effective? What impact, if any, does the timing and scheduling of debates have on attendance? 2. Are the 35 days allocated to the Backbench Business Committee appropriate in the context of other demands on the House’s time? 3. Is the current allocation of Backbench Business debates between the Chamber (27 days) and Westminster Hall (8 days) correct? 4. Are there any improvements that could be made to the Backbench Business Committee’s process to agree applications for backbench business debates (including ensuring debates are popular amongst members and on topical subjects)? 5. Are the existing mechanisms available for the Petitions Committee to hold debates in the Chamber (to apply via Backbench Business Committee, or to be allocated time by the Government) sufficient or should the Petitions Committee have guaranteed time in the Chamber?

Select Committee Inquiry

16 Mar 2026
Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee Debates
Modernisation Committee (Select)
Not accepting submissions

The cross-party Modernisation Committee is holding an inquiry into Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee debates, as part of its ongoing work on how time is used in the Commons.

Backbench Business Committee debates offer MPs a vital route to raise issues on behalf of their constituents, and since its establishment the Committee has ensured that backbench voices are heard regularly.

The Petitions Committee has facilitated many debates on e-petitions started by members of the public, ensuring that issues with significant public support are brought before the House. Many of these debates have helped raise the profile of important issues and, in some cases, led to tangible action being taken.

The Modernisation Committee’s inquiry will look at whether the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates is appropriate and effective. It will also explore other issues such as whether some e-petitions debates should take place in the Chamber on a more regular basis.

MPs on the Committee will also explore the issues highlighted in the Backbench Business Committee’s 15 anniversary report, and how the House can continue to support and strengthen the Committee’s work.

Terms of Reference

The Backbench Business Committee has 35 days allotted in each session for proceedings in the Chamber/Westminster Hall on backbench business, of which at least 27 should be in the Chamber. More information can be found on their website. The Petitions Committee can schedule a petition or petitions for debate in Westminster Hall on a Monday from 4.30pm, for up to three hours. More information is available here.

We will be exploring the following questions as part of our inquiry:

1. Is the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates appropriate and effective?

What impact, if any, does the timing and scheduling of debates have on attendance?
2. Are the 35 days allocated to the Backbench Business Committee appropriate in the context of other demands on the House’s time?

3. Is the current allocation of Backbench Business debates between the Chamber (27 days) and Westminster Hall (8 days) correct?

4. Are there any improvements that could be made to the Backbench Business Committee’s process to agree applications for backbench business debates (including ensuring debates are popular amongst members and on topical subjects)?

5. Are the existing mechanisms available for the Petitions Committee to hold debates in the Chamber (to apply via Backbench Business Committee, or to be allocated time by the Government) sufficient or should the Petitions Committee have guaranteed time in the Chamber?