Debates between Laura Farris and Janet Daby during the 2019 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Laura Farris and Janet Daby
Wednesday 7th February 2024

(2 months, 3 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Janet Daby Portrait Janet Daby (Lewisham East) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

14. What recent discussions she has had with the Secretary of State for the Home Department on the time taken to process claims to the Windrush compensation scheme.

Laura Farris Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department (Laura Farris)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

As of December 2023, 91% of all claims either had received a final decision or were less than six months old. The Windrush scheme has reduced the time taken to allocate a substantive casework decision from 18 months to less than four months. That includes making all essential eligibility checks together with a preliminary assessment to make an initial interim payment of £10,000 wherever possible.

--- Later in debate ---
Laura Farris Portrait Laura Farris
- View Speech - Hansard - -

So far, £75 million has been paid out on more than 2,000 claims. I gently say to the hon. Gentleman that it is not appropriate to draw precise equivalence with things like the Horizon scheme, because that involved a judicial process, with different facts, different losses and different harms. However, we have been making consistent improvements to the compensation scheme, including making it easier for applicants to use, and we have rapidly accelerated the speed at which we make our payments.

Janet Daby Portrait Janet Daby
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Victims of the Windrush scandal have experienced huge injustices of destitution, humiliation and varied health issues, as well as delays in receiving compensation. To make matters worse, they do not currently receive compensation for the loss of private pensions. Will the Minister look into reducing the delays and compensating Windrush victims for private pension losses?