Information between 15th January 2026 - 6th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 182 |
|
20 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 127 |
|
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 184 |
|
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 185 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 310 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 311 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 378 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles: Legacy and Reconciliation - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 373 Noes - 106 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 194 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 195 Noes - 317 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 326 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 311 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 310 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 287 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 108 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 378 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 358 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104 |
|
4 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 392 Noes - 116 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Kirith Entwistle speeches from: SEND Provision: Local Authorities
Kirith Entwistle contributed 1 speech (68 words) Tuesday 3rd March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Education |
|
Kirith Entwistle speeches from: Women’s Safety: Walking, Wheeling, Cycling and Running
Kirith Entwistle contributed 2 speeches (839 words) Tuesday 27th January 2026 - Westminster Hall HM Treasury |
|
Kirith Entwistle speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Kirith Entwistle contributed 2 speeches (79 words) Tuesday 20th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
|
Kirith Entwistle speeches from: Domestic Abuse-related Deaths: NHS Prevention
Kirith Entwistle contributed 1 speech (986 words) Tuesday 20th January 2026 - Westminster Hall Department of Health and Social Care |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
20 Jan 2026, 12:17 p.m. - House of Commons " Can I thank my hon. Friend for his question? I am, of course, more than happy to meet with him, as diaries allow. >> Kirith Entwistle. >> Mr. >> Speaker. >> So stay. >> Mr Speaker. >> The UK continues to. " Rt Hon Yvette Cooper MP, Foreign Secretary, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (Pontefract, Castleford and Knottingley, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 23rd March 2026 2:30 p.m. Home Office Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Home Office (including Topical Questions) Edward Leigh: What assessment she has made of the potential impact of the number of asylum seekers on levels of recorded crime. Mary Kelly Foy: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Michelle Welsh: What steps her Department is taking to help tackle child exploitation. Peter Swallow: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Robin Swann: What guidance her Department has provided to police forces on the application of public order legislation in relation to the expression of religious beliefs. Peter Fortune: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Ian Lavery: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Will Stone: What her timetable is for publishing the Independent Review of Public Order and Hate Crime Legislation. Michelle Welsh: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Seamus Logan: What discussions she has had with the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on the potential impact of changes to worker visas on businesses in rural economies. Bernard Jenkin: What assessment she has made of the potential impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on levels of illegal immigration. Richard Foord: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Gregory Stafford: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Allison Gardner: What steps her Department is taking to use technology to increase police efficiency. Robbie Moore: What steps she is taking to help tackle shop theft. Sarah Dyke: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. John Lamont: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Josh Simons: What recent steps her Department has taken to help tackle illegal working. Jim Dickson: What recent progress her Department has made on tackling antisocial behaviour. Sarah Pochin: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Wera Hobhouse: What assessment she has made of the adequacy of existing legal frameworks in relation to the non-consensual filming of women in public. Fred Thomas: What steps she is taking to help tackle financial abuse. Harpreet Uppal: What recent steps her Department has taken to help tackle knife crime. Lorraine Beavers: What steps her Department is taking to help improve neighbourhood policing. Mike Martin: If she will take steps to provide Ukrainian refugees with a route to permanent settlement. David Simmonds: How many asylum seekers were in asylum accommodation on (a) 30 September 2025 and (b) 30 June 2024. Siân Berry: What discussions she has had with Cabinet colleagues on the potential impact of the introduction of the visa brake on Chevening scholars. Catherine Fookes: What steps she is taking to help tackle violence against women and girls. Sarah Bool: How many asylum seekers were accommodated in asylum accommodation on (a) 30 December 2025 and (b) 30 June 2024. Andy McDonald: Whether the Independent Review of Public Order and Hate Crime Legislation will be published before Consideration of Lords Amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill. John Cooper: What assessment she has made of the potential impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on levels of illegal immigration. Tony Vaughan: What steps she is taking to help support refugee integration. Mary Kelly Foy: What plans her Department has to help tackle antisocial behaviour. Bayo Alaba: What recent steps her Department has taken to help tackle threats to national security in the context of the war in Iran. Kirith Entwistle: What steps her Department is taking to help tackle coercive control by ex-partners. View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 18th March 2026 11:30 a.m. Department for Science, Innovation & Technology Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Science, Innovation and Technology (including Topical Questions) John Whittingdale: What steps her Department is taking to help protect individual digital identities. Kirith Entwistle: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Gordon McKee: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Joe Morris: What steps she is taking to help ensure reliable broadband services in hard to reach areas of rural constituencies. Emily Darlington: What recent discussions she has had with the British Board of Film Classification on regulatory parity between online and offline pornography. Edward Leigh: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Steve Yemm: What assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of AI Growth Zones on regeneration in Mansfield. Susan Murray: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Lisa Smart: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Naushabah Khan: What steps her Department is taking to engage with children and young people on social media use. Adam Thompson: What steps she is taking to increase levels of funding for UK Research and Innovation. Graeme Downie: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Jen Craft: What steps she is taking to help protect children online. Luke Taylor: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Rachel Taylor: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Munira Wilson: What steps she is taking to help ensure the safety of young people online. Lisa Smart: What steps her Department is taking to help tackle misinformation online. Jacob Collier: What steps her Department is taking to engage with children and young people on social media use. Jo Platt: What steps she is taking to help protect children online. Sarah Pochin: What assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of proposed changes to the budget of the Science and Technology Facilities Council on research facilities and programmes. Lincoln Jopp: What steps she is taking with Cabinet colleagues to help improve research and innovation in the defence sector. Gregory Stafford: What steps she is taking with Cabinet colleagues to help improve research and innovation in the defence sector. Chris Bloore: What assessment she has made of the potential merits of her Department taking an equity stake in artificial intelligence companies as part of its Sovereign AI Strategy. View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Women’s Safety: Walking, Wheeling, Cycling and Running
59 speeches (13,864 words) Tuesday 27th January 2026 - Westminster Hall HM Treasury Mentions: 1: Marie Goldman (LD - Chelmsford) Member for Bolton North East (Kirith Entwistle) spoke about the things we do “just in case”, and that - Link to Speech 2: Greg Smith (Con - Mid Buckinghamshire) Members for Bath (Wera Hobhouse), for Bolton North East (Kirith Entwistle) and for North West Leicestershire - Link to Speech 3: Lilian Greenwood (Lab - Nottingham South) Friend the Member for Bolton North East (Kirith Entwistle), the hon. - Link to Speech |
|
Domestic Abuse-related Deaths: NHS Prevention
29 speeches (11,554 words) Tuesday 20th January 2026 - Westminster Hall Department of Health and Social Care Mentions: 1: Gregory Stafford (Con - Farnham and Bordon) Member for Bolton North East (Kirith Entwistle) for telling us about her experiences. - Link to Speech 2: Karin Smyth (Lab - Bristol South) Friend the Member for Bolton North East (Kirith Entwistle) said in her excellent speech, we need to join - Link to Speech |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 24th February 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th March 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 5th May 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 24th March 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
16 Mar 2026
Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee Debates Modernisation Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The cross-party Modernisation Committee is holding an inquiry into Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee debates, as part of its ongoing work on how time is used in the Commons. Backbench Business Committee debates offer MPs a vital route to raise issues on behalf of their constituents, and since its establishment the Committee has ensured that backbench voices are heard regularly. The Petitions Committee has facilitated many debates on e-petitions started by members of the public, ensuring that issues with significant public support are brought before the House. Many of these debates have helped raise the profile of important issues and, in some cases, led to tangible action being taken. The Modernisation Committee’s inquiry will look at whether the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates is appropriate and effective. It will also explore other issues such as whether some e-petitions debates should take place in the Chamber on a more regular basis. MPs on the Committee will also explore the issues highlighted in the Backbench Business Committee’s 15 anniversary report, and how the House can continue to support and strengthen the Committee’s work. Terms of Reference The Backbench Business Committee has 35 days allotted in each session for proceedings in the Chamber/Westminster Hall on backbench business, of which at least 27 should be in the Chamber. More information can be found on their website. The Petitions Committee can schedule a petition or petitions for debate in Westminster Hall on a Monday from 4.30pm, for up to three hours. More information is available here. We will be exploring the following questions as part of our inquiry: 1. Is the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates appropriate and effective?
3. Is the current allocation of Backbench Business debates between the Chamber (27 days) and Westminster Hall (8 days) correct? 4. Are there any improvements that could be made to the Backbench Business Committee’s process to agree applications for backbench business debates (including ensuring debates are popular amongst members and on topical subjects)? 5. Are the existing mechanisms available for the Petitions Committee to hold debates in the Chamber (to apply via Backbench Business Committee, or to be allocated time by the Government) sufficient or should the Petitions Committee have guaranteed time in the Chamber? |