Information between 28th November 2025 - 28th December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 340 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 364 Noes - 167 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 347 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 164 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 343 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 176 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 346 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 369 Noes - 166 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 350 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 166 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 182 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 357 Noes - 174 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 298 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 304 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 299 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 296 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 154 Noes - 303 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 162 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 96 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 162 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 395 Noes - 98 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 96 |
|
15 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 311 Noes - 96 |
|
16 Dec 2025 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 118 Noes - 340 |
|
16 Dec 2025 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 329 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 341 Noes - 195 |
|
17 Dec 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Kirith Entwistle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 165 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Special Educational Needs: Finance
Asked by: Kirith Entwistle (Labour - Bolton North East) Tuesday 2nd December 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with reference to the Government response to the Fair Funding Review consultation published on 20 November 2025, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of cumulative Dedicated Schools Grant deficits on local authorities’ ability to deliver services for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The government recognises that local authorities are continuing to face significant pressure from the impact of Dedicated Schools Grant deficits on their accounts.
Government will set out its ambitious plans for reform of SEND provision early in the new year to deliver a sustainable system which supports children and families effectively. The 2025 Spending Review provided investment for SEND reform. Future funding implications will be managed within the overall government DEL envelope, such that we would not expect local authorities to need to fund future special educational needs costs from general funds, once the Statutory Override ends at the end of 2027-28. We will set out further details on our plans to support local authorities with historic and accruing deficits through the upcoming Local Government Finance Settlement. |
|
Local Government Finance
Asked by: Kirith Entwistle (Labour - Bolton North East) Tuesday 2nd December 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps his Department is taking to support local authorities with Dedicated Schools Grant deficits. Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The government recognises that local authorities are continuing to face significant pressure from the impact of Dedicated Schools Grant deficits on their accounts.
Government will set out its ambitious plans for reform of SEND provision early in the new year to deliver a sustainable system which supports children and families effectively. The 2025 Spending Review provided investment for SEND reform. Future funding implications will be managed within the overall government DEL envelope, such that we would not expect local authorities to need to fund future special educational needs costs from general funds, once the Statutory Override ends at the end of 2027-28. We will set out further details on our plans to support local authorities with historic and accruing deficits through the upcoming Local Government Finance Settlement. |
|
Local Government Finance
Asked by: Kirith Entwistle (Labour - Bolton North East) Tuesday 2nd December 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether the Fair Funding Review methodology will take account of historic and projected cost pressures arising from SEND demand and associated Dedicated Schools Grant deficits when determining funding allocations to local authorities. Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Fair Funding review will introduce a fairer, evidence-based funding system that reflects local circumstances and directs more support to the most deprived areas, ensuring the best value for money for government and taxpayers. New methodology will ensure funding is distributed to the places that need it most, using our most up-to-date assessment of need and demand across the system. These updates will account for local circumstances, including for different ability to raise income locally from council tax, and the variation in the cost delivering services. There is no direct link between Dedicated Schools Grants deficits and allocations following the Fair Funding Review. However, Government recognises that local authorities are continuing to face significant pressure from the impact of deficits on their accounts, and will address this outside of the Fair Funding Review Ambitious plans for reform of special educational needs provision will be set out early in the new year to deliver a sustainable system which supports children and families effectively. Future funding implications will be managed within the overall government DEL envelope, such that we would not expect local authorities to need to fund future special educational needs costs from general funds, once the Statutory Override ends at the end of 2027-28. We will set out further details on our plans to support local authorities with historic and accruing deficits through the upcoming Local Government Finance Settlement. |
|
Local Government Finance
Asked by: Kirith Entwistle (Labour - Bolton North East) Tuesday 2nd December 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether he has made an assessment of the potential impact of unresolved Dedicated Schools Grant deficits on the ability of local authorities such as Bolton Council to benefit from a redistribution of resources arising from the Fair Funding Review. Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Fair Funding review will introduce a fairer, evidence-based funding system that reflects local circumstances and directs more support to the most deprived areas, ensuring the best value for money for government and taxpayers. New methodology will ensure funding is distributed to the places that need it most, using our most up-to-date assessment of need and demand across the system. These updates will account for local circumstances, including for different ability to raise income locally from council tax, and the variation in the cost delivering services. There is no direct link between Dedicated Schools Grants deficits and allocations following the Fair Funding Review. However, Government recognises that local authorities are continuing to face significant pressure from the impact of deficits on their accounts, and will address this outside of the Fair Funding Review Ambitious plans for reform of special educational needs provision will be set out early in the new year to deliver a sustainable system which supports children and families effectively. Future funding implications will be managed within the overall government DEL envelope, such that we would not expect local authorities to need to fund future special educational needs costs from general funds, once the Statutory Override ends at the end of 2027-28. We will set out further details on our plans to support local authorities with historic and accruing deficits through the upcoming Local Government Finance Settlement. |
|
Local Government Finance
Asked by: Kirith Entwistle (Labour - Bolton North East) Tuesday 2nd December 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment he has made of the potential implications of Dedicated Schools Grant deficits, including that of Bolton Council, for the implementation of the Fair Funding Review’s objective of directing resources to areas with the greatest levels of need. Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Fair Funding review will introduce a fairer, evidence-based funding system that reflects local circumstances and directs more support to the most deprived areas, ensuring the best value for money for government and taxpayers. New methodology will ensure funding is distributed to the places that need it most, using our most up-to-date assessment of need and demand across the system. These updates will account for local circumstances, including for different ability to raise income locally from council tax, and the variation in the cost delivering services. There is no direct link between Dedicated Schools Grants deficits and allocations following the Fair Funding Review. However, Government recognises that local authorities are continuing to face significant pressure from the impact of deficits on their accounts, and will address this outside of the Fair Funding Review Ambitious plans for reform of special educational needs provision will be set out early in the new year to deliver a sustainable system which supports children and families effectively. Future funding implications will be managed within the overall government DEL envelope, such that we would not expect local authorities to need to fund future special educational needs costs from general funds, once the Statutory Override ends at the end of 2027-28. We will set out further details on our plans to support local authorities with historic and accruing deficits through the upcoming Local Government Finance Settlement. |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Crime and Policing Bill
100 speeches (26,958 words) Committee stage part one Monday 15th December 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: None result from cases of survivors and campaigners that were brought to the attention of my colleague Kirith Entwistle - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 12th December 2025
Formal Minutes - Formal minutes 2024-25 Backbench Business Committee Found: Less Survivable Cancers • Clive Jones: Impact of NHS workforce levels on cancer patients • Kirith Entwistle |
|
Thursday 11th December 2025
Report - Large print - 1st Report - Access to the House of Commons and its Procedures Modernisation Committee Found: Bromwich) Bobby Dean (Liberal Democrat; Carshalton and Wallington) Chris Elmore (Labour; Bridgend) Kirith Entwistle |
|
Thursday 11th December 2025
Report - 1st Report - Access to the House of Commons and its Procedures Modernisation Committee Found: Bromwich) Bobby Dean (Liberal Democrat; Carshalton and Wallington) Chris Elmore (Labour; Bridgend) Kirith Entwistle |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 10th February 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Thursday 11th December 2025
Report - Large print - 1st Report - Access to the House of Commons and its Procedures Modernisation Committee |
|
Thursday 11th December 2025
Report - 1st Report - Access to the House of Commons and its Procedures Modernisation Committee |
|
Thursday 11th December 2025
Report - Easy Read - 1st Report - Access to the House of Commons and its Procedures Modernisation Committee |
|
Thursday 11th December 2025
Minutes and decisions - Summary of Committee’s meeting on 18 November 2025 Modernisation Committee |
|
Wednesday 7th January 2026
Minutes and decisions - Summary of Committee’s meeting on 2 December 2025 Modernisation Committee |