Security Vetting Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Security Vetting

Kieran Mullan Excerpts
Monday 20th April 2026

(1 day, 8 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I reject the idea that any pressure is a good reason not to disclose to the Prime Minister that UKSV recommended against clearance for a very senior, sensitive appointment. I simply do not accept that that is an adequate reason, whatever the pressure.

Kieran Mullan Portrait Dr Kieran Mullan (Bexhill and Battle) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The Prime Minister is suggesting that the idea that the security services had concerns about this appointment was a bolt from the blue to him two weeks ago, despite the fact it had been on the front page of a national newspaper in September. However, my question is not about the vetting file, because we all know the answer that the Prime Minister is going to give on that. This is separate from the vetting file. Was he at any stage made aware of any element of the security services raising concerns about the appointment of Mandelson?

Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

No. What I knew was that security clearance had been given by the Foreign Office, in the way that I have set out to the House.