All 1 Kevan Jones contributions to the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Tue 7th Feb 2017

European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Exiting the European Union

European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill

Kevan Jones Excerpts
Committee: 2nd sitting: House of Commons
Tuesday 7th February 2017

(7 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Committee of the whole House Amendments as at 7 February 2017 - (7 Feb 2017)
Tim Farron Portrait Tim Farron
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are dealing with many fundamental problems in any event.

Forgive me if I am being pedantic, but the reality is that we are not talking about a second referendum. One could argue that the referendum on 23 June was the second referendum. We are arguing for a referendum on the terms of the deal, which has not been put to the British people.

Kevan Jones Portrait Mr Kevan Jones (North Durham) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

The hon. Gentleman says that we would reach a cliff edge, but his offer of a referendum involves no choice. People would either have to vote for it or against it. If they vote against it, what would that leave? There would be that cliff edge that people are trying to avoid.

Tim Farron Portrait Tim Farron
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are offering the British people an opportunity not only to have the final say on the terms of the deal, but to say, having looked over the cliff edge, “No thanks,” and to remain in the European Union. That is a perfectly legitimate democratic offer for a party to make. While it is thoroughly legitimate to have an alternative point of view, that is fully democratic.

--- Later in debate ---
Tim Farron Portrait Tim Farron
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The right hon. Gentleman is quite wrong, because undoubtedly—I have said this very clearly—the majority of people voted on 23 June to leave the European Union. That is the direction of travel that the Government have a mandate to follow at this point. What the British people did not do, because they were not asked, is decide on the destination. As the Brexit Secretary rightly said in his speech just over four years ago, destination and departure are different things. It is right for democrats to make the case that the British people should not have their will taken from them and should not have a stitch-up imposed upon them.

Kevan Jones Portrait Mr Kevan Jones
- Hansard - -

What would happen if we did have a second referendum and the British people rejected the offer? Where would that leave us?

Tim Farron Portrait Tim Farron
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The wording on the ballot paper would be up for discussion, but our vision is that the United Kingdom would either accept the terms negotiated by the Government or remain in the European Union.