Information between 2nd November 2025 - 22nd November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 169 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 130 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 140 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 200 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 120 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 194 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 123 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 144 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 178 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 227 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 102 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 36 Noes - 102 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 123 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 58 Noes - 125 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 107 Noes - 136 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 72 Noes - 147 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 169 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 195 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 66 Noes - 175 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Beamish voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Beamish speeches from: Caribbean: US Military Action
Lord Beamish contributed 1 speech (135 words) Wednesday 12th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Defence |
|
Lord Beamish speeches from: Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill
Lord Beamish contributed 3 speeches (1,202 words) 2nd reading Tuesday 4th November 2025 - Lords Chamber |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Factories: Ammunition
Asked by: Lord Beamish (Labour - Life peer) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with local authorities, combined authorities and industry representatives in the North East regarding the potential of an "always on" munitions factory in the region. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) It is vital we invest our defence spending across UK whenever possible to grow our economy and industrial base. As set out in our recent publication UK Defence Footprint, MoD spent £178 million in the North East in 2024 to 2025. To support economic growth, our industrial base and defence capacity, we have committed £1.5 billion in the Strategic Defence Review to move munitions production to “always on” and build six new munitions and energetics factories, taking our total munitions spend this parliament to £6 billion. The MOD is carefully considering arrangements for those factories, including their potential locations, and more detail will be set out in due course.
|
|
Factories: Ammunition
Asked by: Lord Beamish (Labour - Life peer) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have made an assessment of the potential contribution to addressing regional imbalances of locating one of the proposed "always-on" munitions factories in the North East. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) It is vital we invest our defence spending across UK whenever possible to grow our economy and industrial base. As set out in our recent publication UK Defence Footprint, MoD spent £178 million in the North East in 2024 to 2025. To support economic growth, our industrial base and defence capacity, we have committed £1.5 billion in the Strategic Defence Review to move munitions production to “always on” and build six new munitions and energetics factories, taking our total munitions spend this parliament to £6 billion. The MOD is carefully considering arrangements for those factories, including their potential locations, and more detail will be set out in due course.
|
|
Factories: Ammunition
Asked by: Lord Beamish (Labour - Life peer) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government when they expect to announce the locations of the six new "always-on" munitions factories; and whether they will publish the criteria being used to determine site selection. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) It is vital we invest our defence spending across UK whenever possible to grow our economy and industrial base. As set out in our recent publication UK Defence Footprint, MoD spent £178 million in the North East in 2024 to 2025. To support economic growth, our industrial base and defence capacity, we have committed £1.5 billion in the Strategic Defence Review to move munitions production to “always on” and build six new munitions and energetics factories, taking our total munitions spend this parliament to £6 billion. The MOD is carefully considering arrangements for those factories, including their potential locations, and more detail will be set out in due course.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
4 Nov 2025, 5:57 p.m. - House of Lords ">> My Lords, it's a pleasure to follow the noble Lord Lord Beamish, and he. >> Deployed a lot of knowledge and " Lord Beamish (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
4 Nov 2025, 6:01 p.m. - House of Lords "sovereign base in perpetuity. And the noble Lord Lord Beamish " Lord Bellingham (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
4 Nov 2025, 7:30 p.m. - House of Lords "entirely overlooked the Chagossian people, a calumny that was repeated by the noble Lord Lord Beamish. Not " Lord Murray of Blidworth (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
4 Nov 2025, 8:10 p.m. - House of Lords "noble friend Lord de Mauley, even the noble Lord Lord Beamish, nobly " Baroness Goldie (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
4 Nov 2025, 8:12 p.m. - House of Lords "agreement and the Sovereign Base areas in Cyprus to which the noble Lord Lord Beamish refer. The whole " Baroness Goldie (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
4 Nov 2025, 8:16 p.m. - House of Lords "noble Lord. I think what I said in response to the point raised by noble Lord Lord Beamish, that when comparing the Sovereign Base areas " Baroness Goldie (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
4 Nov 2025, 8:16 p.m. - House of Lords "comparing the Sovereign Base areas in Cyprus with this arrangement, they are not the same, because the point the noble Lord Lord Beamish " Baroness Goldie (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
4 Nov 2025, 8:20 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Lord Beamish the respect in which they are held in this house. " Baroness Goldie (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
4 Nov 2025, 8:44 p.m. - House of Lords "be detrimental to marine life. As Lord Beamish, Who chair of the ISC, said this is about money. It is " Baroness Chapman of Darlington, Minister of State (Development) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
18 Nov 2025, 2:48 p.m. - House of Lords " Lord Beamish. Thank you. " Lord Beamish (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
18 Nov 2025, 2:55 p.m. - House of Lords "question asked by the noble Lord Lord Beamish when it comes to MoD procurement within the United Kingdom, there are two certainties. " Baroness Goldie (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
18 Nov 2025, 8:18 p.m. - House of Lords ">> Can I thank my noble friend Lord Beamish for all the work that he has been doing on this, both through the Esrc and beforehand? My " Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill
105 speeches (40,297 words) 2nd reading Tuesday 4th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Mentions: 1: Lord Bellingham (Con - Life peer) My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Beamish. - Link to Speech 2: Lord Murray of Blidworth (Con - Life peer) had entirely overlooked the Chagossian people, a calumny that was repeated by the noble Lord, Lord Beamish - Link to Speech 3: Baroness Goldie (Con - Life peer) Even the noble Lord, Lord Beamish, nobly supporting his Government, said, “China is a threat”. - Link to Speech 4: Baroness Goldie (Con - Life peer) The point that the noble Lord, Lord Beamish, made was, in fact, about expeditiously communicating with - Link to Speech |