Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Katie White and Gregory Stafford

Tuesday 10th February 2026 Commons Chamber

[Gregory Stafford (Farnham and Bordon) (Con)]

17. What assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of energy infrastructure-related technologies imported from China on security.

[The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero (Katie White)]

This Government take energy security extremely seriously. We run one of the world’s safest, most reliable energy systems, and we are a top destination for investment. Investment in our energy infrastructure undergoes the highest level of national security scrutiny.

[Gregory Stafford]

Given reports from Norway and Denmark that Chinese-manufactured electric buses contain remote kill switch technology, and that the recent UK-China engagement appears to have delivered an embassy for the Chinese and little more than a Labubu for the United Kingdom, how can the Minister be confident that Chinese-made energy infrastructure does not pose similar national security risks? What steps is she taking to remove our reliance on Chinese-made infrastructure?

[Katie White]

That is slightly audacious, given that when we left government in 2010 we had, I think, three of the top solar companies in the world, but when we came back into office we had nothing—there was no supply chain. National security is this Government’s No. 1 overriding priority. We are engaging constructively with every opportunity and all actors but at the same time making sure that every single decision takes into account our national security, which comes first above anything else.